Add governance and release process docs

[caniszczyk]

https://groups.google.com/a/opencontainers.org/forum/#!topic/dev/x-Oh3PDz1Y8

Signed-off-by: Chris Aniszczyk caniszczyk@gmail.com

[wking]

Looks good to me: $ (cd runtime-spec && git --no-pager log -1 --oneline origin/pr/521 && git ls-tree origin/pr/521 GOVERNANCE.md RELEASES.md) 6cf3cf3 Add governance and release process docs 100644 blob 59c00bbc9bfd2d5255ff648aa478aa6662f4a1f0 GOVERNANCE.md 100644 blob e220042c89008275b86f44c967983675f39f968e RELEASES.md $ (cd project-template && git --no-pager log -1 --oneline origin/pr/15 && git ls-tree origin/pr/15 GOVERNANCE.md RELEASES.md) 56abe12 GOVERNANCE and RELEASES: split the files 100644 blob 59c00bbc9bfd2d5255ff648aa478aa6662f4a1f0 GOVERNANCE.md 100644 blob e220042c89008275b86f44c967983675f39f968e RELEASES.md

[cyphar]

LGTM, as discussed on the mailing list.

[wking]

On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 08:25:01PM -0700, Aleksa Sarai wrote:

LGTM, as discussed on the mailing list.

I'm fairly positive about this change, and I feel like it's already
been approved by runtime-spec maintainers [1,2]:

+8 Alexander Morozov, Brandon Philips, Daniel Dao, Mrunal Patel, Qiang
Huang, Tianon Gravi, Vincent Batts, Vishnu Kannan
-0
#1 Michael Crosby

But as a purely technical question, why does your LGTM get the
PullApprove button? It's configured to look at
runtime-spec-maintainers 3, and you aren't one [4](yet? ;).

 Subject: [project-template adopted]: Merge 56abe122 (+13 -0 #5)
 Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 16:51:58 +0000
 Message-ID: <CAD2oYtPwMcF__WD32cV6dHgHt8=F6qFw+XFGw4iQK9LGi_QWsg@mail.gmail.com>

 Subject: Add governance and releases docs

[vbatts]

LGTM

On Sat, Jul 23, 2016, 00:00 W. Trevor King notifications@github.com wrote:

On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 08:25:01PM -0700, Aleksa Sarai wrote:

LGTM, as discussed on the mailing list.

I'm fairly positive about this change, and I feel like it's already
been approved by runtime-spec maintainers [1,2]:

+8 Alexander Morozov, Brandon Philips, Daniel Dao, Mrunal Patel, Qiang
Huang, Tianon Gravi, Vincent Batts, Vishnu Kannan
-0
#1 Michael Crosby

But as a purely technical question, why does your LGTM get the
PullApprove button? It's configured to look at
runtime-spec-maintainers [3], and you aren't one [4](yet? ;).

Subject: [project-template adopted]: Merge 56abe122 (+13 -0 #5)
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 16:51:58 +0000
Message-ID: <CAD2oYtPwMcF__WD32cV6dHgHt8=
F6qFw+XFGw4iQK9LGi_QWsg@mail.gmail.com>
[2]:
opencontainers/project-template#15 (comment)
Subject: Add governance and releases docs
[3]:

runtime-spec/.pullapprove.yml

Line 8 in bb6925e

- runtime-spec-maintainers

[4]:
https://github.com/opencontainers/runtime-spec/blob/bb6925ea99f0e366a3f7d1c975f6577475ca25f0/MAINTAINERS

—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#521 (comment),
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAEF6dmOrl9GvssXofNjuHZHKvhQ5ueKks5qYZHSgaJpZM4JTCu7
.

[cyphar]

I have no clue why I get a pull approve button. Maybe it's a sign? 😉

[wking]

On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 05:41:35AM -0700, Vincent Batts wrote:

LGTM

And @vbatts does not get a PullApprove button? Maybe someone has
mixed up runc-maintainers and runtime-spec-maintainers when populating
the GitHub groups?

[cyphar]

I just checked. @vbatts is in the runtime-spec-maintainers group, and so am I (which I think is a mistake caused by all of the reorganisation of the groups, I'll leave it now).

[wking]

On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 08:18:27AM -0700, Aleksa Sarai wrote:

@vbatts is in the runtime-spec-maintainers group, and so am I (which
I think is a mistake, I'll leave it now).

So that explains why you got the button, but we're still not sure why
@vbatts didn't.

[dqminh]

LGTM