-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 232
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Elastic-ecs mapping improvements for network traffic attributes #1410
Elastic-ecs mapping improvements for network traffic attributes #1410
Conversation
…butes in to_stix_map
…n-name SCO objects
"geo": { | ||
"city_name": { | ||
"key": "x-ecs-client.geo_city_name", | ||
"object": "client" | ||
"key": "x-ecs-geo.city_name", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I wonder if we should just create a generic custom geography object instead of tying it to ecs. Someone else is currently working on the mappings for the log analytics connector, and there is also a need there to capture geo information.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I tend to agree. There was a comment to that effect too. We can have it mimic the properties of the Location SDO to achieve genericity and completeness.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you please update your fork while creating this pr? it shows 51 commits in the pr which suggest your fork branch is out of date.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Few unittests are failing.
Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #1410 +/- ##
==========================================
Coverage ? 85.37%
==========================================
Files ? 589
Lines ? 44541
Branches ? 0
==========================================
Hits ? 38028
Misses ? 6513
Partials ? 0
☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
This pull request addresses issues #1407, #1408, #1409, #1412.