Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove kfp_tekton from the testing notebooks #478

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 27, 2024

Conversation

atheo89
Copy link
Member

@atheo89 atheo89 commented Mar 26, 2024

Related to: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHOAIENG-4784

Description

The end-to-end tests in the notebooks repository are failing because the kfp_tekton library has been removed and replaced with odh-elyra.

Ref on CI test: https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/test-platform-results/pr-logs/pull/opendatahub-io_notebooks/476/pull-ci-opendatahub-io-notebooks-main-notebooks-e2e-tests/1771201766046568448#1:build-log.txt%3A518

Merge criteria:

  • The commits are squashed in a cohesive manner and have meaningful messages.
  • Testing instructions have been added in the PR body (for PRs involving changes that are not immediately obvious).
  • The developer has manually tested the changes and verified that the changes work

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from dibryant and harshad16 March 26, 2024 08:48
@jstourac
Copy link
Member

For reference - kfp-tekton removal in #467

" expected_major_minor = '1.6.0'\n",
"\n",
" self.assertLess(kfp_tekton.__version__, expected_major_minor)\n",
"\n",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we want to remove it also from the intel one? I still can see the kfp-tekton in relevant Pipfile here?

Actually, writing this comment now, is it okay that some of our images under the jupyter directory still contains the kfp-tekton?

$ grep -r kfp-tekton                                                                         
jupyter/intel/pytorch/ubi9-python-3.9/Pipfile.cpu:kfp-tekton = "<1.6.0"
jupyter/intel/pytorch/ubi9-python-3.9/Pipfile.gpu:kfp-tekton = "<1.6.0"
jupyter/intel/pytorch/ubi9-python-3.9/Pipfile.lock.cpu:        "kfp-tekton": {
jupyter/intel/pytorch/ubi9-python-3.9/Pipfile.lock.gpu:        "kfp-tekton": {
jupyter/intel/ml/ubi9-python-3.9/Pipfile:kfp-tekton = "<1.6.0"
jupyter/intel/ml/ubi9-python-3.9/Pipfile.lock:        "kfp-tekton": {
jupyter/intel/tensorflow/ubi9-python-3.9/Pipfile.cpu:kfp-tekton = "<1.6.0"
jupyter/intel/tensorflow/ubi9-python-3.9/Pipfile.gpu:kfp-tekton = "<1.6.0"
jupyter/intel/tensorflow/ubi9-python-3.9/Pipfile.lock.cpu:        "kfp-tekton": {
jupyter/intel/tensorflow/ubi9-python-3.9/Pipfile.lock.gpu:        "kfp-tekton": {
habana/1.10.0/ubi8-python-3.8/Pipfile:kfp-tekton = "<1.6.0"
habana/1.10.0/ubi8-python-3.8/Pipfile.lock:        "kfp-tekton": {
habana/1.11.0/ubi8-python-3.8/Pipfile:kfp-tekton = "<1.6.0"
habana/1.11.0/ubi8-python-3.8/Pipfile.lock:        "kfp-tekton": {
habana/1.9.0/ubi8-python-3.8/Pipfile:kfp-tekton = "<1.6.0"
habana/1.9.0/ubi8-python-3.8/Pipfile.lock:        "kfp-tekton": {
habana/1.13.0/ubi8-python-3.8/Pipfile:kfp-tekton = "<1.6.0"
habana/1.13.0/ubi8-python-3.8/Pipfile.lock:        "kfp-tekton": {

If this is something we need for the DSPv2, shouldn't we update this for all supported images? Maybe we don't care about the intel ones for rhoai and we care just about the habana 1.13?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey, Jan thanks for the review! 🙂
I'll revert the change from Intel since this PR was already in place before the removal of kfp_tekton.

Regarding Habana - The latest 1.13 has been updated with the removal [1] but the others haven't.
@harshad16 what are your thoughts on what we should do for the rest of Habana?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah, yeah, sorry about it - forgot to update the local cloned repo 🙃 this is good then.

Regarding the others - let's see what Harshad thinks. Technically, we should care just about the "supported" (not sure what we mean with it in upstream, though) images so they can work with the DSPv2, correct?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No changes are required for the intel-based images.
we would work on the intel-based images, as we move further in upcoming sprints.

@atheo89 atheo89 force-pushed the RHOAIENG-4784 branch 5 times, most recently from 85f003a to fe55689 Compare March 26, 2024 09:24
Copy link
Member

@harshad16 harshad16 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve

thanks 💯

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 26, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: harshad16, jstourac

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@harshad16
Copy link
Member

/test notebooks-e2e-tests

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 26, 2024

@atheo89: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/habana-notebooks-e2e-tests 9bdcdd2 link true /test habana-notebooks-e2e-tests
ci/prow/images 9bdcdd2 link true /test images
ci/prow/notebooks-e2e-tests 9bdcdd2 link true /test notebooks-e2e-tests

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@atheo89 atheo89 merged commit aefe060 into opendatahub-io:main Mar 27, 2024
9 of 13 checks passed
@atheo89 atheo89 deleted the RHOAIENG-4784 branch October 23, 2024 08:04
atheo89 added a commit to atheo89/notebooks that referenced this pull request Jan 16, 2025
RStudio: added grabbing proxy-related env vars from container context setting them in R global env file
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants