-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 70
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove kfp_tekton from the testing notebooks #478
Conversation
For reference - |
" expected_major_minor = '1.6.0'\n", | ||
"\n", | ||
" self.assertLess(kfp_tekton.__version__, expected_major_minor)\n", | ||
"\n", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we want to remove it also from the intel one? I still can see the kfp-tekton
in relevant Pipfile here?
Actually, writing this comment now, is it okay that some of our images under the jupyter directory still contains the kfp-tekton
?
$ grep -r kfp-tekton
jupyter/intel/pytorch/ubi9-python-3.9/Pipfile.cpu:kfp-tekton = "<1.6.0"
jupyter/intel/pytorch/ubi9-python-3.9/Pipfile.gpu:kfp-tekton = "<1.6.0"
jupyter/intel/pytorch/ubi9-python-3.9/Pipfile.lock.cpu: "kfp-tekton": {
jupyter/intel/pytorch/ubi9-python-3.9/Pipfile.lock.gpu: "kfp-tekton": {
jupyter/intel/ml/ubi9-python-3.9/Pipfile:kfp-tekton = "<1.6.0"
jupyter/intel/ml/ubi9-python-3.9/Pipfile.lock: "kfp-tekton": {
jupyter/intel/tensorflow/ubi9-python-3.9/Pipfile.cpu:kfp-tekton = "<1.6.0"
jupyter/intel/tensorflow/ubi9-python-3.9/Pipfile.gpu:kfp-tekton = "<1.6.0"
jupyter/intel/tensorflow/ubi9-python-3.9/Pipfile.lock.cpu: "kfp-tekton": {
jupyter/intel/tensorflow/ubi9-python-3.9/Pipfile.lock.gpu: "kfp-tekton": {
habana/1.10.0/ubi8-python-3.8/Pipfile:kfp-tekton = "<1.6.0"
habana/1.10.0/ubi8-python-3.8/Pipfile.lock: "kfp-tekton": {
habana/1.11.0/ubi8-python-3.8/Pipfile:kfp-tekton = "<1.6.0"
habana/1.11.0/ubi8-python-3.8/Pipfile.lock: "kfp-tekton": {
habana/1.9.0/ubi8-python-3.8/Pipfile:kfp-tekton = "<1.6.0"
habana/1.9.0/ubi8-python-3.8/Pipfile.lock: "kfp-tekton": {
habana/1.13.0/ubi8-python-3.8/Pipfile:kfp-tekton = "<1.6.0"
habana/1.13.0/ubi8-python-3.8/Pipfile.lock: "kfp-tekton": {
If this is something we need for the DSPv2, shouldn't we update this for all supported images? Maybe we don't care about the intel ones for rhoai and we care just about the habana 1.13?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey, Jan thanks for the review! 🙂
I'll revert the change from Intel since this PR was already in place before the removal of kfp_tekton.
Regarding Habana - The latest 1.13 has been updated with the removal [1] but the others haven't.
@harshad16 what are your thoughts on what we should do for the rest of Habana?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah, yeah, sorry about it - forgot to update the local cloned repo 🙃 this is good then.
Regarding the others - let's see what Harshad thinks. Technically, we should care just about the "supported" (not sure what we mean with it in upstream, though) images so they can work with the DSPv2, correct?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No changes are required for the intel-based images.
we would work on the intel-based images, as we move further in upcoming sprints.
85f003a
to
fe55689
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
/approve
thanks 💯
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: harshad16, jstourac The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/test notebooks-e2e-tests |
@atheo89: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
RStudio: added grabbing proxy-related env vars from container context setting them in R global env file
Related to: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHOAIENG-4784
Description
The end-to-end tests in the notebooks repository are failing because the kfp_tekton library has been removed and replaced with odh-elyra.
Ref on CI test: https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/test-platform-results/pr-logs/pull/opendatahub-io_notebooks/476/pull-ci-opendatahub-io-notebooks-main-notebooks-e2e-tests/1771201766046568448#1:build-log.txt%3A518
Merge criteria: