The RawFile-LocalPV OpenEBS Data-Engine is a similar but more flexible, yet more complex derivation of the LocalPV-Hostpath Data-Engine.
This are a few reasons to consider using node-based (rather than network-based) storage architetcure:
- Performance: Almost no network-based storage solution can keep up with baremetal disk performance in terms of IOPS/latency/throughput combined. And you’d like to get the best out of the SSD you’ve got!
- On-premise Environment: You might not be able to afford the cost of upgrading all your networking infrastructure, to get the best out of your network-based storage solution.
- Complexity: Network-based solutions are distributed systems. And distributed systems are not easy! You might want to have a system that is easier to understand and to reason about. Also, with less complexity, you can fix unpredicted issues more easily.
The OpenEBS LocalPV-HostPath Data-Engine makes it pretty easy to automatically provision hostPath PVs and use them in your workloads. But, there are known limitations though:
Important
- You can’t monitor volume usage: There are hacky workarounds to run “du” regularly, but that could prove to be a performance killer, since it could put a lot of burden on your CPU and cause your filesystem cache to fill up. Not really good for a production workload.
- You can’t enforce hard limits on your volume’s size: Again, you can hack your way around it, with the same caveats.
- You are stuck with whatever filesystem your kubelet node is offering.
- You can’t customize your filesystem.
### All the above issues stem from the same root cause: - hostPath/LocalPVs are simple bind-mounts from the host filesystem into the pod.
To use a Filesystem based 'extent file' as the emulated block device (i.e. a soft-LUN block device), and leverage the LINUX loop device to associate that soft-LUN file as a complete flexibe block device (i.e. an emulated soft disk device). At this point you can create a PV with a fileystem on it. This allows you to...
Note
- You can monitor volume usage by running
df -hT
inO(1)
since each soft-LUN block device is mounted separately on the local node (displaying utilization status/metrics or each mountpoint). - The size limit is enforced by the operating system, based on the backing file system capacity and soft-lun device file size.
- Since volumes are backed by different files, each soft-lin device file can be formatted using different filesystems, and/or customized with different filesystem options.
- Kubernetes: 1.21+
helm install -n kube-system rawfile-csi ./deploy/charts/rawfile-csi/
Create a StorageClass
with your desired options:
apiVersion: storage.k8s.io/v1
kind: StorageClass
metadata:
name: my-sc
provisioner: rawfile.csi.openebs.io
reclaimPolicy: Delete
volumeBindingMode: WaitForFirstConsumer
allowVolumeExpansion: true
- Direct I/O: Near-zero disk performance overhead
- Dynamic provisioning
- Enforced volume size limit
- Access Modes
- ReadWriteOnce
ReadOnlyManyReadWriteMany
- Volume modes
-
Filesystem
mode -
Block
mode
-
- Volume metrics
- Supports fsTypes:
ext4
,btrfs
,xfs
- Online expansion: If fs supports it (e.g. ext4, btrfs, xfs)
- Online shrinking: If fs supports it (e.g. btrfs)
- Offline expansion/shrinking
- Ephemeral inline volume
- Filesystem-level snapshots:
btrfs
supported