adding see also tables

[jesgreco]

adding see also table for roles_for_viewing.rst

[openedx-webhooks]

Thanks for the pull request, @jesgreco!

What's next?

Please work through the following steps to get your changes ready for engineering review:

🔘 Get product approval

If you haven't already, check this list to see if your contribution needs to go through the product review process.

• If it does, you'll need to submit a product proposal for your contribution, and have it reviewed by the Product Working Group.
  • This process (including the steps you'll need to take) is documented here.
• If it doesn't, simply proceed with the next step.

🔘 Provide context

To help your reviewers and other members of the community understand the purpose and larger context of your changes, feel free to add as much of the following information to the PR description as you can:

• Dependencies

  This PR must be merged before / after / at the same time as ...

• Blockers

  This PR is waiting for OEP-1234 to be accepted.

• Timeline information

  This PR must be merged by XX date because ...

• Partner information

  This is for a course on edx.org.

• Supporting documentation
• Relevant Open edX discussion forum threads

🔘 Get a green build

If one or more checks are failing, continue working on your changes until this is no longer the case and your build turns green.

🔘 Let us know that your PR is ready for review:

Who will review my changes?

This repository is currently maintained by @openedx/docs-openedx-org-maintainers. Tag them in a comment and let them know that your changes are ready for review.

Where can I find more information?

If you'd like to get more details on all aspects of the review process for open source pull requests (OSPRs), check out the following resources:

• Overview of Review Process for Community Contributions
• Pull Request Status Guide
• Making changes to your pull request

When can I expect my changes to be merged?

Our goal is to get community contributions seen and reviewed as efficiently as possible.

However, the amount of time that it takes to review and merge a PR can vary significantly based on factors such as:

• The size and impact of the changes that it introduces
• The need for product review
• Maintenance status of the parent repository

💡 As a result it may take up to several weeks or months to complete a review and merge your PR.

[jswope00]

@jesgreco can you also add /references/testing_course_content.rst to the See Also section?

The rule of thumb is that see also sections should at least include any of the docs that are in the same navigation section as the doc that is being read. In this case, navigation to roles_for_viewing.rst lives in educators/navigation/content_creation_management.rst

[jswope00]

@jesgreco This PR has a conflict with the main branch. Looks to me like the conflict is in the resources_for_course_teams.rst file. In the main branch, that file has a full set of "seealso" links. In your PR, there is only one or two.

So, you'll need to merge the remote main branch into your working branch, and fix the conflict by using the main's version of resources_for_course_teams.rst, and then try your PR again.

Alernatively, I think you could just undo all your changes in resources_for_course_teams.rst and then the PR will pass with no conflicts.

[jswope00]

Fix the conflict (see my comment in the thread) and then re-request a PR

[jesgreco]

@jswope00 conflicts were solved and also changes requested were made.