-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Consideration for validating and linting the OAS with IBM's openapi-validator #24
Comments
Good idea to use a validator. |
OK @Schpidi. Well let me know if I should address the issues or not. Thanks |
At https://github.com/Schpidi/ogcapi-coverages-1 I'm working to get a complete valid version of the schemas from which the relevant parts can be used in the various OAPI repos. I'm using the spectral linter which is quite happy right now using The IBM validator reports some issues. I guess we should try to follow the recommendations shouldn't we?
|
2021-07-28: Last week Stephan confirmed that the latest schema from OpenAPI branch passed linting with Spectral with no errors. Now that the OpenAPI definitions from schema-work branch are merged into master, please file a new issue if new errors are discovered. |
Unfortunately I was unable to contribute to the development of the coverages OAS at the hackathon in London.
I would however like to propose that we use IBM's openapi-validator to further standardize the way that the coverages OAS looks.
The results of running the validator are as follows
As you can see there are some issues here which relate closely to those raised in #23 for example.
Does anyone have preference on this issue? I would like to know whether I should invest the time to address the issues flagged by the linter before I go ahead and do so.
Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: