Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[squeezebox] Add sleep channel #10196

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 25, 2021
Merged

Conversation

mhilbush
Copy link
Contributor

Add a sleep channel to the player thing that powers off the player after the specified number of minutes.

Signed-off-by: Mark Hilbush mark@hilbush.com

Signed-off-by: Mark Hilbush <mark@hilbush.com>
@mhilbush mhilbush added the enhancement An enhancement or new feature for an existing add-on label Feb 18, 2021
Copy link
Contributor

@t2000 t2000 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One small comment from my side. Otherwise it looks good to me.

@@ -301,6 +301,10 @@ public void rate(String mac, String rateCommand) {
}
}

public void sleep(String mac, Duration sleepDuration) {
sendCommand(mac + " sleep " + String.valueOf(sleepDuration.toSeconds()));
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am wondering, since the API supports seconds, if it would make sense to also support seconds instead of minutes.

For sure the normal use case would be a timer that you use for listening to a web radio until you fall asleep and there it is fine to enter some minutes. However, one could also think of using this in rules to play some seconds of an alarm sound and automatically turn off the player afterwards.

Do you think it would make sense to use seconds instead of minutes or would you say that my use-case is too artificial?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No, it's a good question. I debated whether to use minutes or seconds. So, I bailed out on making the decision and I asked the user who requested the feature. 😉 He suggested minutes.

https://community.openhab.org/t/feature-request-squeezebox-binding-add-sleep-channel/117278/9

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess the other option would've been to use the Number:Time QuantityType. But since the binding doesn't use QuantityTypes anywhere else (at least I don't think it does), I decided against it.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I assume you saw my selection of 1 day as the upper limit, which was a completely arbitrary selection on my part.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes I saw the 1 day for the upper limit and thought that should be sufficient.

Well if the community thinks minutes is sufficient, then leave it like that. I just thought we can offer whats possible and not restrict it arbitrarily.

Copy link
Contributor

@cpmeister cpmeister left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@cpmeister cpmeister merged commit 9af7ae8 into openhab:main Feb 25, 2021
@cpmeister cpmeister added this to the 3.1 milestone Feb 25, 2021
@mhilbush mhilbush deleted the squeezebox-sleep branch February 25, 2021 23:53
themillhousegroup pushed a commit to themillhousegroup/openhab2-addons that referenced this pull request May 10, 2021
Signed-off-by: Mark Hilbush <mark@hilbush.com>
Signed-off-by: John Marshall <john.marshall.au@gmail.com>
computergeek1507 pushed a commit to computergeek1507/openhab-addons that referenced this pull request Jul 13, 2021
Signed-off-by: Mark Hilbush <mark@hilbush.com>
thinkingstone pushed a commit to thinkingstone/openhab-addons that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2021
Signed-off-by: Mark Hilbush <mark@hilbush.com>
marcfischerboschio pushed a commit to bosch-io/openhab-addons that referenced this pull request May 5, 2022
Signed-off-by: Mark Hilbush <mark@hilbush.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement An enhancement or new feature for an existing add-on
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants