Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[telegram] Invalid escape of underscore character when sending messages (Revert "Solves issue #11691 (#13758)") #14314

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 2, 2023

Conversation

Daniel-at-git
Copy link
Contributor

Commit 1d23c32 broke sending underscore character in messages #14204

This PR reverts commit 1d23c32 and fix #14204.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Schröter d.schroeter@gmx.de

…b#14204)

This PR reverts commit 1d23c32 and fix openhab#14204.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Schröter d.schroeter@gmx.de
Signed-off-by: Daniel Schröter <d.schroeter@gmx.de>
@jlaur jlaur requested review from lolodomo and clinique February 1, 2023 19:54
@holgerfriedrich holgerfriedrich added the bug An unexpected problem or unintended behavior of an add-on label Feb 1, 2023
@lsiepel
Copy link
Contributor

lsiepel commented Feb 1, 2023

As this is a regression, i hope it is considered as a patch to 3.4.x

Copy link
Contributor

@clinique clinique left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@lolodomo
Copy link
Contributor

lolodomo commented Feb 2, 2023

But PR #13758 was resolving issue #11691.

Does this mean this PR reintroduces issue #11691?

@jlaur
Copy link
Contributor

jlaur commented Feb 2, 2023

But PR #13758 was resolving issue #11691.

Does this mean this PR reintroduces issue #11691?

My understanding from the linked issue: Yes, it does. But it's the better evil as it seems the fix broke more than it fixed. So a proper fix (or documentation update) should probably be made. But as a quick fix, which can also be backported to 3.4.x, this revert seems okay.

@lolodomo, I'll let you merge. I can then cherry-pick to 3.4.x if you agree.

Copy link
Contributor

@jlaur jlaur left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@lolodomo lolodomo merged commit 4d9bf1c into openhab:main Feb 2, 2023
@lolodomo lolodomo added this to the 4.0 milestone Feb 2, 2023
@Daniel-at-git
Copy link
Contributor Author

@lolodomo, I'll let you merge. I can then cherry-pick to 3.4.x if you agree.

@lolodomo: Can you agree to merge it in 3.4.x? Last time it has been merged also to 3.4.x....
Thanks!

@lolodomo
Copy link
Contributor

lolodomo commented Feb 7, 2023

Ok to apply the change to branch 3.4.x

jlaur pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 7, 2023
#14314)

This PR reverts commit 1d23c32 and fix #14204.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Schröter <d.schroeter@gmx.de>
@jlaur jlaur added the patch A PR that has been cherry-picked to a patch release branch label Feb 7, 2023
psmedley pushed a commit to psmedley/openhab-addons that referenced this pull request Feb 23, 2023
…b#14204) (openhab#14314)

This PR reverts commit 1d23c32 and fix openhab#14204.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Schröter <d.schroeter@gmx.de>
nemerdaud pushed a commit to nemerdaud/openhab-addons that referenced this pull request Feb 28, 2023
…b#14204) (openhab#14314)

This PR reverts commit 1d23c32 and fix openhab#14204.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Schröter <d.schroeter@gmx.de>
FordPrfkt pushed a commit to FordPrfkt/openhab-addons that referenced this pull request Apr 20, 2023
…b#14204) (openhab#14314)

This PR reverts commit 1d23c32 and fix openhab#14204.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Schröter <d.schroeter@gmx.de>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug An unexpected problem or unintended behavior of an add-on patch A PR that has been cherry-picked to a patch release branch
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[telegram] Invalid escape of underscore character when sending messages
6 participants