Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Document offset support for DateTimeItem trigger in RulesDSL #2364

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 12, 2024

Conversation

jimtng
Copy link
Contributor

@jimtng jimtng commented Sep 10, 2024

Signed-off-by: Jimmy Tanagra <jcode@tanagra.id.au>
Copy link

netlify bot commented Sep 10, 2024

Thanks for your pull request to the openHAB documentation! The result can be previewed at the URL below (this comment and the preview will be updated if you add more commits).

Built without sensitive environment variables

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 4ddf5d4
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/openhab-docs-preview/deploys/66e01557f06bc70008db2d50
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-2364--openhab-docs-preview.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@holgerfriedrich
Copy link
Member

holgerfriedrich commented Sep 10, 2024

PR in core is now merged.

@jimtng Thanks core creating the docs PR.

I was wondering why the other option of DateTimeTrigger timeOnly was not found by our indexer:
image
though it is mentioned in the documentation here
Maybe one of the docs maintainers could comment how this works.....

@stefan-hoehn stefan-hoehn added this to the 4.3 milestone Sep 12, 2024
@stefan-hoehn stefan-hoehn merged commit 0cbc62a into openhab:main Sep 12, 2024
4 checks passed
@jimtng jimtng deleted the rulesdsl-timeoffset branch September 25, 2024 07:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants