Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: add a IMOrdinaryUser #61

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 8, 2024
Merged

Conversation

luhaoling
Copy link
Contributor


🔍 What type of PR is this?

👀 What this PR does / why we need it:

  • My pull request adheres to the code style of this project
  • My code requires changes to the documentation
  • I have updated the documentation as required
  • All the tests have passed

🅰 Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

📝 Special notes for your reviewer:

🎯 Describe how to verify it

📑 Additional documentation e.g., RFC, notion, Google docs, usage docs, etc.:

Copy link

sweep-ai bot commented Jan 8, 2024

Apply Sweep Rules to your PR?

  • Apply: All new business logic should have corresponding unit tests.
  • Apply: Refactor large functions to be more modular.
  • Apply: Add docstrings to all functions and file headers.

@FGadvancer FGadvancer merged commit 870b7ac into openimsdk:main Jan 8, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants