-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8304837: Classfile API throws IOOBE for MethodParameters attribute without parameter names #13167
8304837: Classfile API throws IOOBE for MethodParameters attribute without parameter names #13167
Conversation
👋 Welcome back SirYwell! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
Nice catch, issue opened at https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8304837 and marked as blocking compiler changes. |
src/java.base/share/classes/jdk/internal/classfile/impl/BoundAttribute.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Webrevs
|
Oops, looks like I was too late to create the issue haha |
Co-authored-by: liach <7806504+liach@users.noreply.github.com>
Thanks for the review. I moved the comment and changed to |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It looks good, thank you for finding and fixing the bug.
Great work, feel free to @ me if you need a quick sponsor once you integrate it |
And just to double-check, the JVMS does allow the parameter name information to be missing even if the access flags are defined:
|
@SirYwell This pull request has been inactive for more than 4 weeks and will be automatically closed if another 4 weeks passes without any activity. To avoid this, simply add a new comment to the pull request. Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration! |
Keeping alive |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
looks good
|
@SirYwell This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 489 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@asotona, @TheShermanTanker, @vicente-romero-oracle) but any other Committer may sponsor as well. ➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type |
/integrate |
Thank you for your review, @vicente-romero-oracle. |
Nice! :) |
/sponsor |
Going to push as commit a2d3fc8.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
@TheShermanTanker @SirYwell Pushed as commit a2d3fc8. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
After merging master into #9862, we encountered test failures (e.g., https://github.com/SirYwell/jdk/actions/runs/4500940829/jobs/7923018438#step:9:2541). The Classfile API tries to read from constant pool index 0 if a MethodParameters attribute has an entry without name.
The fix is simply using
readUtf8EntryOrNull
instead ofreadUtf8Entry
. The related code already correctly handles nullability.I didn't find an appropriate test class so I added a new one. Let me know if there's a better place or if the test can be improved somehow.
As I don't have a JBS account, someone needs to create a bug report there for me. Thanks.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/13167/head:pull/13167
$ git checkout pull/13167
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/13167
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/13167/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 13167
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 13167
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13167.diff
Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment