Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8346048: test/lib/containers/docker/DockerRunOptions.java uses addJavaOpts() from ctor #22748

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

lmesnik
Copy link
Member

@lmesnik lmesnik commented Dec 14, 2024

Trivial fix to avoid using methods from DockerRunOptions().

Don't methods final, just for using them in ctor.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8346048: test/lib/containers/docker/DockerRunOptions.java uses addJavaOpts() from ctor (Bug - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/22748/head:pull/22748
$ git checkout pull/22748

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/22748
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/22748/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 22748

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 22748

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22748.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Dec 14, 2024

👋 Welcome back lmesnik! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 14, 2024

@lmesnik This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8346048: test/lib/containers/docker/DockerRunOptions.java uses addJavaOpts() from ctor

Reviewed-by: dholmes

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 8 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • ab1dbd4: 8346202: Correct typo in SQLPermission
  • 6b022bb: 8344453: Test jdk/jfr/event/oldobject/TestSanityDefault.java timed out
  • 3b9de11: 8319875: Add macOS implementation for jcmd System.map
  • ebb27c2: 8346139: test_memset_with_concurrent_readers.cpp should not use
  • c2f0ef5: 8346159: Disable CDS AOTClassLinking tests for JVMCI due to JDK-8345635
  • 4b21fb9: 8343467: Remove unnecessary @SuppressWarnings annotations (security)
  • e7fc0eb: 8345987: java.management has two Util.newObjectName methods (remove one)
  • f647d4d: 8345936: Call ClassLoader.getResourceAsByteArray only for multi-release jar

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Dec 14, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 14, 2024

@lmesnik The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-runtime

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot-runtime hotspot-runtime-dev@openjdk.org label Dec 14, 2024
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Dec 14, 2024

Webrevs

@dholmes-ora
Copy link
Member

Don't methods final, just for using them in ctor.

I would be more inclined to make them final because there is no reason for them to be overridden. Took me a while to realize what was being complained about here: potential invocation of a subclass implementation of the method before the instance is fully initialized.

@lmesnik
Copy link
Member Author

lmesnik commented Dec 16, 2024

Yes, should be mentioned that it is just to fix javac warning. I am not sure if anyone going extend this class, so let make the methods final. If anyone wants to override them they should deal with javac warnings/errors/

Copy link
Member

@dholmes-ora dholmes-ora left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems fine to me. Thanks

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Dec 16, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot-runtime hotspot-runtime-dev@openjdk.org ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants