Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8329951: var emits deprecation warnings that do not point to the file or position #23683

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

archiecobbs
Copy link
Contributor

@archiecobbs archiecobbs commented Feb 18, 2025

This PR fixes a bug that causes certain warnings to be emitted without source file location information.

Consider this example:

import java.util.*;
import java.util.function.*;
public class Example {

    @SuppressWarnings("deprecation")
    List<Observable> m1() { return null; }

    void m2() {
        for (var o : m1()) { }
    }
}

the compiler outputs this:

$ javac -Xlint:deprecation Example.java 
warning: [deprecation] Observable in java.util has been deprecated
1 warning

but it should instead output this:

Example.java:9: warning: [deprecation] Observable in java.util has been deprecated
        for (var o : m1()) { }
             ^
1 warning

The bug happens because the "synthetic" type that is installed dynamically for implicitly typed variables is not given a source code position. This makes some sense (?) because that type doesn't literally appear in the variable declaration; however, certain error messages expect to be able to point to the type portion of a variable declaration, so it also causes this bug (and presumably similar variants). To fix this, we just copy the position of the variable declaration itself to the synthetic type.

However, this change necessitated another change: The fix for JDK-8200199 added back in 2018 relies on the fact that the position of an implicitly typed variable is always null, so this change breaks that fix. But since then, a new method JCVariableDecl.declaredUsingVar() was added, so we can just use that test instead. This also makes the code a little clearer.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8329951: var emits deprecation warnings that do not point to the file or position (Bug - P4)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/23683/head:pull/23683
$ git checkout pull/23683

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/23683
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/23683/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 23683

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 23683

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23683.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Feb 18, 2025

👋 Welcome back acobbs! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 18, 2025

❗ This change is not yet ready to be integrated.
See the Progress checklist in the description for automated requirements.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 18, 2025

@archiecobbs The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • compiler

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the compiler compiler-dev@openjdk.org label Feb 18, 2025
@archiecobbs archiecobbs marked this pull request as ready for review February 19, 2025 15:40
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Feb 19, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Feb 19, 2025

Webrevs

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
compiler compiler-dev@openjdk.org rfr Pull request is ready for review
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant