Skip to content

Conversation

@caspernorrbin
Copy link
Member

@caspernorrbin caspernorrbin commented Oct 22, 2025

Hi everyone,

The test TestSystemMetrics.java sometimes fails on cgroupv2 when comparing read/write I/O metrics (rios/wios) because the expected value doesn't match the one read from the io.stat file. The current approach in this test is somewhat flawed, it reads from the same io.stat file cgroup file twice, once directly and once through jdk.internal.platform.Metrics, and assumes the values should be identical. In practice, this assumption does not hold. Unrelated I/O running in the same cgroup may increment the counter between reads, leading to discrepancies.

The current comparisons have a 25% margin from the original value to account for incidental noise, but this doesn't work well on the I/O operation counters, which can have very small values (sometimes as low as 0), which makes the percentage-based margin useless. As a result, this test is at risk of failing whenever activity happens between the 2 file readings.

For greater reliability, I suggest we should instead check that the value is increasing rather than expecting equality. This is already done for other metrics, such as CPU and memory usage, and more accurately reflects the expected behaviour of the counters. Switching to this check removes the reliance on error margins and results in a more stable and meaningful test.

Testing:

  • Repeated runs of TestSystemMetrics.java without any observed failures.
  • Oracle tiers 1-5

Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8313770: jdk/internal/platform/docker/TestSystemMetrics.java fails on Ubuntu (Bug - P3)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/27934/head:pull/27934
$ git checkout pull/27934

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/27934
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/27934/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 27934

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 27934

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27934.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Oct 22, 2025

👋 Welcome back cnorrbin! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 22, 2025

@caspernorrbin This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8313770: jdk/internal/platform/docker/TestSystemMetrics.java fails on Ubuntu

Reviewed-by: sgehwolf, mbaesken, syan

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 16 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title 8313770 8313770: jdk/internal/platform/docker/TestSystemMetrics.java fails on Ubuntu Oct 22, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot-runtime hotspot-runtime-dev@openjdk.org label Oct 22, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 22, 2025

@caspernorrbin The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-runtime

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Oct 22, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Oct 22, 2025

Webrevs

Copy link
Contributor

@jerboaa jerboaa left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Oct 22, 2025
@caspernorrbin
Copy link
Member Author

Thank you all for the reviews!

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 23, 2025

Going to push as commit aec1388.
Since your change was applied there have been 19 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Oct 23, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Oct 23, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Oct 23, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 23, 2025

@caspernorrbin Pushed as commit aec1388.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

hotspot-runtime hotspot-runtime-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants