Skip to content

Conversation

@shipilev
Copy link
Member

@shipilev shipilev commented Jan 6, 2026

See more details in the bug. This PR makes the counters updated on allocation path more robust. New regression test captures the original failure (intermittently). This would be also backported to JDK 26.

Additional testing:

  • Linux x86_64 server fastdebug, gc/epsilon, 100x
  • Linux x86_64 server fastdebug, runtime/cds/appcds/TestEpsilonGCWithCDS.java, 100x
  • Linux x86_64 server fastdebug, gc/epsilon/TestInitAllocs.java, 1000x

Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8373941: Epsilon: Robust counter updates in early VM phases (Bug - P3)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/29061/head:pull/29061
$ git checkout pull/29061

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/29061
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/29061/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 29061

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 29061

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/29061.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jan 6, 2026

👋 Welcome back shade! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 6, 2026

@shipilev This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8373941: Epsilon: Robust counter updates in early VM phases

Reviewed-by: stefank, tschatzl

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 24 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot-gc hotspot-gc-dev@openjdk.org label Jan 6, 2026
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 6, 2026

@shipilev The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-gc

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@shipilev shipilev marked this pull request as ready for review January 6, 2026 13:05
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jan 6, 2026
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jan 6, 2026

Webrevs

@shipilev
Copy link
Member Author

shipilev commented Jan 8, 2026

@stefank -- is that what you had in mind as one of the solutions?

Copy link
Member

@stefank stefank left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me.

Kim would probably prefer if you changed the volatile bool _ready to use the new Atomic<bool> class.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jan 9, 2026
@shipilev
Copy link
Member Author

shipilev commented Jan 9, 2026

Kim would probably prefer if you changed the volatile bool _ready to use the new Atomic<bool> class.

Right. There are other cases in Epsilon that would enjoy this conversion. Tell you what, let's do this version (so that is also easily backportable), and then I'll do a cleanup that converts all Epsilon code to Atomic<T>: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8374876

@openjdk openjdk bot removed the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jan 9, 2026
@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jan 9, 2026
@shipilev
Copy link
Member Author

shipilev commented Jan 9, 2026

Thanks for reviews, @stefank, @tschatzl! Here goes.

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 9, 2026

Going to push as commit 47e1935.
Since your change was applied there have been 24 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Jan 9, 2026
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jan 9, 2026
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jan 9, 2026
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 9, 2026

@shipilev Pushed as commit 47e1935.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

hotspot-gc hotspot-gc-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants