Conversation
|
👋 Welcome back aptmac! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
|
@aptmac This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be: You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 2 new commits pushed to the
Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
|
@aptmac Please do not rebase or force-push to an active PR as it invalidates existing review comments. Note for future reference, the bots always squash all changes into a single commit automatically as part of the integration. See OpenJDK Developers’ Guide for more information. |
Webrevs
|
|
@aptmac Please do not rebase or force-push to an active PR as it invalidates existing review comments. Note for future reference, the bots always squash all changes into a single commit automatically as part of the integration. See OpenJDK Developers’ Guide for more information. |
|
@aptmac Please do not rebase or force-push to an active PR as it invalidates existing review comments. Note for future reference, the bots always squash all changes into a single commit automatically as part of the integration. See OpenJDK Developers’ Guide for more information. |
|
Will have to go back over this one, looks like the test case isn't able to find the lz4-java class that we're trying to use: |
|
Hm, taking a look at the jar that's pulled in from maven central, the packages aren't exported: Edit: that require-capability on java 7 is also kind of suspicious |
|
I contributed a PR to the new lz4-java repo, which should fix the package exports: yawkat/lz4-java#28 Will need to check back here once it's released and verify that it actually works. |
|
Gave this a test now that the 1.10.2 release is out, and it's working as expected now |
|
@aptmac Please do not rebase or force-push to an active PR as it invalidates existing review comments. Note for future reference, the bots always squash all changes into a single commit automatically as part of the integration. See OpenJDK Developers’ Guide for more information. |
|
Could we merge this soon? |
Yeah, but it needs a review first |
|
Sorry, I mistook it for another PR. |
RealCLanger
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks correct and tests are green.
|
Closing in-favor of #702, upstream should be updated with everything else Oracle included in their latest release |
There's currently a security advisory open for the version of lz4-java we are using. lz4-java had been archived, but has been updated by a new maintainer with a fix for the security issue.
See: GHSA-cmp6-m4wj-q63q
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
gitCheckout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jmc.git pull/694/head:pull/694$ git checkout pull/694Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/694$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jmc.git pull/694/headUsing Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 694View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 694Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jmc/pull/694.diff
Using Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment