-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[REVIEW]: Fireworks: Reproducible Machine Learning with PyTorch #1478
Comments
Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks. @dirmeier it looks like you're currently assigned as the reviewer for this paper 🎉. ⭐ Important ⭐ If you haven't already, you should seriously consider unsubscribing from GitHub notifications for this (https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews) repository. As a reviewer, you're probably currently watching this repository which means for GitHub's default behaviour you will receive notifications (emails) for all reviews 😿 To fix this do the following two things:
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
|
|
Hi @dirmeier . Do you have any updates on this review or any questions? |
Hello @dirmeier! Have you had a chance to take a look? |
Yeah, the review is in the repo's issue tracker.. |
@whedon commands |
Here are some things you can ask me to do:
|
@whedon generate pdf |
|
PDF failed to compile for issue #1478 with the following error: /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/bundler/gems/whedon-18b9a37e7f54/lib/whedon/orcid_validator.rb:12:in |
@whedon generate pdf |
|
PDF failed to compile for issue #1478 with the following error: /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/bundler/gems/whedon-85c572552d68/lib/whedon/orcid_validator.rb:12:in |
Hey @arokem , |
@whedon generate pdf |
|
PDF failed to compile for issue #1478 with the following error: /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/bundler/gems/whedon-85c572552d68/lib/whedon/orcid_validator.rb:12:in |
@openjournals/joss-eics : does anyone know what this error means? I am failing to debug this just by looking at the markdown. |
I would try removing the empty |
something is wrong with an orcid |
@smk508 : I implemented @kyleniemeyer's suggestion here: kellylab/Fireworks#75. If you merge that, we can take a look and see what remains to complete the review of this paper. |
Hi @arokem , Sorry I was on vacation for the weekend so I didn't see this. I've merged the PR. |
@whedon generate pdf |
|
PDF failed to compile for issue #1478 with the following error: /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/bundler/gems/whedon-85c572552d68/lib/whedon/author.rb:58:in |
Also, I don't think Kubeflow is a journal, so in paper.bib: |
@whedon generate pdf |
|
Ok I've updated the kubeflow citation in paper.bib. The current version is 0.3.2, yes. I don't know how to change the top post in this thread to say 0.3.2. |
@whedon set 0.3.2 as version |
OK. 0.3.2 is the version. |
@whedon accept |
|
Check final proof 👉 openjournals/joss-papers#849 If the paper PDF and Crossref deposit XML look good in openjournals/joss-papers#849, then you can now move forward with accepting the submission by compiling again with the flag
|
sorry, I see a few more small things in the bib - can we try with kellylab/Fireworks#76 ? |
@whedon generate pdf |
|
Ok I merged the PR |
@whedon accept |
|
Check final proof 👉 openjournals/joss-papers#850 If the paper PDF and Crossref deposit XML look good in openjournals/joss-papers#850, then you can now move forward with accepting the submission by compiling again with the flag
|
@whedon accept deposit=true |
|
🐦🐦🐦 👉 Tweet for this paper 👈 🐦🐦🐦 |
🚨🚨🚨 THIS IS NOT A DRILL, YOU HAVE JUST ACCEPTED A PAPER INTO JOSS! 🚨🚨🚨 Here's what you must now do:
Any issues? notify your editorial technical team... |
Thanks! |
🎉🎉🎉 Congratulations on your paper acceptance! 🎉🎉🎉 If you would like to include a link to your paper from your README use the following code snippets:
This is how it will look in your documentation: We need your help! Journal of Open Source Software is a community-run journal and relies upon volunteer effort. If you'd like to support us please consider doing either one (or both) of the the following:
|
Submitting author: @smk508 (Saad Khan)
Repository: https://github.com/kellylab/Fireworks
Version: 0.3.2
Editor: @arokem
Reviewer: @dirmeier
Archive: 10.5281/zenodo.3339548
Status
Status badge code:
Reviewers and authors:
Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)
Reviewer instructions & questions
@dirmeier, please carry out your review in this issue by updating the checklist below. If you cannot edit the checklist please:
The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @arokem know.
✨ Please try and complete your review in the next two weeks ✨
Review checklist for @dirmeier
Conflict of interest
Code of Conduct
General checks
Functionality
Documentation
Software paper
paper.md
file include a list of authors with their affiliations?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: