Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[PRE REVIEW]: bwsample: Processing Best-Worst Scaling data #3112

Closed
whedon opened this issue Mar 14, 2021 · 34 comments
Closed

[PRE REVIEW]: bwsample: Processing Best-Worst Scaling data #3112

whedon opened this issue Mar 14, 2021 · 34 comments
Assignees
@mikldk @jakryd @ejhigson
Labels
pre-review Python

Comments

@whedon
Copy link

whedon commented Mar 14, 2021 •
edited
Loading

Submitting author: @ulf1 (Ulf Hamster)
Repository: https://github.com/satzbeleg/bwsample
Version: 0.6.0
Editor: @mikldk
Reviewers: @ejhigson, @jakryd
Managing EiC: Arfon Smith

⚠️ JOSS reduced service mode ⚠️

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @ulf1. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@ulf1 if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands
@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Mar 14, 2021

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

⚠️ JOSS reduced service mode ⚠️

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@whedon generate pdf

@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Mar 14, 2021 

Software report (experimental):

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.08 s (390.5 files/s, 58606.9 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                          19            432            757           1348
Markdown                         3             85              0            230
Jupyter Notebook                 3              0           1377            108
TeX                              1              7              0             94
YAML                             3              5              0             42
JSON                             1              0              0             18
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            30            529           2134           1840
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Statistical information for the repository '4057eae9665580b1e86a204f' was
gathered on 2021/03/14.
The following historical commit information, by author, was found:

Author                     Commits    Insertions      Deletions    % of changes
UH                              58          3475            938          100.00

Below are the number of rows from each author that have survived and are still
intact in the current revision:

Author                     Rows      Stability          Age       % in comments
UH                         2537           73.0          0.4                7.45

@whedon whedon added the Python label Mar 14, 2021
@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Mar 14, 2021 

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 is OK
- 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 is OK
- 10.1177/074391569201100202 is OK
- 10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00227-8 is OK
- 10.1214/aos/1079120141 is OK
- 10.31219/osf.io/qkxej is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Mar 14, 2021

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

@arfon arfon added the waitlisted Submissions in the JOSS backlog due to reduced service mode. label Mar 14, 2021
@arfon
Copy link
Member

arfon commented Mar 14, 2021

Thanks for your submission to JOSS @ulf1. Unfortunately all of our editors in this area are very busy right now so I've added this paper to the waitlist.

@ulf1
Copy link

ulf1 commented Mar 15, 2021

Hello @arfon I moved the repository into a new organisation but couldn't change URL anymore. The new location is https://github.com/satzbeleg/bwsample
Is there a way to change the path?

@arfon
Copy link
Member

arfon commented Mar 15, 2021

Is there a way to change the path?

Yep, I've gone ahead and done that for you.

@danielskatz
Copy link

👋 @mikldk - Would you be able to edit this submission? It might be a little outside of your core area, but it's been waiting a while, and I think you might be able to handle it.

@danielskatz
Copy link

@whedon invite @mikldk as editor

@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented May 13, 2021

@mikldk has been invited to edit this submission.

@mikldk
Copy link

mikldk commented May 14, 2021

@whedon assign me as editor

@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented May 14, 2021

OK, the editor is @mikldk

@mikldk mikldk removed the waitlisted Submissions in the JOSS backlog due to reduced service mode. label May 14, 2021
@mikldk
Copy link

mikldk commented May 14, 2021

@ulf1 - thank you for the submission.

Do you have any suggestions for reviewers (here is a list of potential reviewers)?

@ulf1
Copy link

ulf1 commented May 14, 2021

Hello @mikldk
maybe rasbt, desilinguist, ahurriyetoglu, betatim, yxoos, or apiad

@mikldk
Copy link

mikldk commented May 17, 2021

@rasbt, @desilinguist: Would you be interested in reviewing this submission to The Journal of Open Source Software? Reviews are open and based on a checklist. The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. If you have any questions or concerns please let me know.

@desilinguist
Copy link

If this can wait until first week of June, I can probably do it.

@rasbt
Copy link

rasbt commented May 19, 2021

Sorry, I currently have a large backlog of reviews (JOSE, ICCV, and upcoming NeurIPS) in the next weeks/months and shouldn't add more to my plate right now. I am happy to check back mid-July though in case an additional reviewer is needed

@mikldk
Copy link

mikldk commented May 19, 2021

@ahurriyetoglu, @betatim: Would you be interested in reviewing this submission to The Journal of Open Source Software? Reviews are open and based on a checklist. The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. If you have any questions or concerns please let me know.

@mikldk
Copy link

mikldk commented May 25, 2021

@yxoos, @apiad: Would you be interested in reviewing this submission to The Journal of Open Source Software? Reviews are open and based on a checklist. The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. If you have any questions or concerns please let me know.

@amirhszd
Copy link

amirhszd commented May 25, 2021 via email

@apiad
Copy link

apiad commented May 25, 2021

I'm glad to review, but in the next couple of weeks I'm gonna be busy, so I'll do it slowly if that's OK.

@mikldk
Copy link

mikldk commented May 25, 2021

@stsievert, @ejhigson: Would you be interested in reviewing this submission to The Journal of Open Source Software? Reviews are open and based on a checklist. The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. If you have any questions or concerns please let me know.

@ejhigson
Copy link

I'm happy to review this!

@mikldk
Copy link

mikldk commented May 26, 2021

@whedon assign @ejhigson as reviewer

@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented May 26, 2021

OK, @ejhigson is now a reviewer

@stsievert
Copy link

My apologies @mikldk, but I'll have to decline. I don't have the bandwidth right now.

@mikldk
Copy link

mikldk commented May 27, 2021

@GregoryAshton: Would you be interested in reviewing this submission to The Journal of Open Source Software? Reviews are open and based on a checklist. The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. If you have any questions or concerns please let me know.

@GregoryAshton
Copy link

Hi @mikldk, I'm not able to commit to reviews at the moment due to other commitments. I'll be available in a month or so. Apologies.

@mikldk
Copy link

mikldk commented Jun 1, 2021

@jakryd: Would you be interested in reviewing this submission to The Journal of Open Source Software? Reviews are open and based on a checklist. The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. If you have any questions or concerns please let me know.

@jakryd
Copy link

jakryd commented Jun 1, 2021

Hello @mikldk, I would be happy to.

@mikldk
Copy link

mikldk commented Jun 1, 2021

@whedon add @jakryd as reviewer

@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Jun 1, 2021

OK, @jakryd is now a reviewer

@mikldk
Copy link

mikldk commented Jun 1, 2021

@whedon start review

@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Jun 1, 2021

OK, I've started the review over in #3324.

@whedon whedon closed this as completed Jun 1, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@mikldk mikldk

@jakryd jakryd

@ejhigson ejhigson

Labels
pre-review Python
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests