[PRE REVIEW]: diyepw: A Python package for Do-It-Yourself EnergyPlus 1 weather file generation

[whedon]

Submitting author: @amandadsmith (Amanda D. Smith)
Repository: https://github.com/IMMM-SFA/diyepw/
Version: 1.0.4
Editor: @timtroendle
Reviewers: @samuelduchesne, @ritwikagarwal
Managing EiC: Kyle Niemeyer

⚠️ JOSS reduced service mode ⚠️

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @amandadsmith. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

The author's suggestion for the handling editor is @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman.

@amandadsmith if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

⚠️ JOSS reduced service mode ⚠️

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@whedon generate pdf

[whedon]

PDF failed to compile for issue #3187 with the following error:

 Can't find any papers to compile :-(

[whedon]

Software report (experimental):

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.06 s (501.3 files/s, 38492.4 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                          20            314            594           1114
reStructuredText                 3             65             45            122
Markdown                         6             23              0            119
DOS Batch                        1              8              1             26
make                             1              4              7              9
TOML                             1              0              0              6
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            32            414            647           1396
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Statistical information for the repository 'b05ed781d84db01e89e4c2b8' was
gathered on 2021/04/17.
The following historical commit information, by author, was found:

Author                     Commits    Insertions      Deletions    % of changes
Amanda Smith                     7           738              8            2.06
Benjamin Stürmer               157          4175           3004           19.85
travis                           8         14157          14091           78.09

Below are the number of rows from each author that have survived and are still
intact in the current revision:

Author                     Rows      Stability          Age       % in comments
Benjamin Stürmer           1944           46.6          3.7               15.33
travis                       78            0.6          1.1               34.62

[kyleniemeyer]

@whedon generate pdf from branch joss-paper

[whedon]

Attempting PDF compilation from custom branch joss-paper. Reticulating splines etc...

[whedon]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[kyleniemeyer]

Hi @amandadsmith, thanks for your interest in JOSS. Unfortunately, we have a bit of a backlog, and due to a lack of suitable and available editors, I'm going to put this on our waitlist for now. We will assign this to an editor as soon as one becomes available.

[amandadsmith]

Thank you for the status update @kyleniemeyer

[timtroendle]

@openjournals/joss-eics I could take on this submission as editor.

[danielskatz]

@whedon assign @timtroendle as editor

[whedon]

OK, the editor is @timtroendle

[timtroendle]

Hello @amandadsmith! I started looking for reviewers. If you have any suggestions, please let us know.

[timtroendle]

👋 @samuelduchesne & @ralphevins, would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS?

[samuelduchesne]

Hi @timtroendle, I would be happy to review this!

[amandadsmith]

Hi @timtroendle, thanks! The following JOSS reviewers also look like they may fit the bill: sarats, jtmiclat, ritwikagarwal, willu47

[timtroendle]

👋 @sarats & @jtmiclat, would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS?

[timtroendle]

👋 @ritwikagarwal & @willu47, would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS?

[ritwikagarwal]

Would be happy to pick up!
Thanks

[timtroendle]

That's great, @ritwikagarwal. Thanks for letting us know. We can now start the review with the two of you, @ritwikagarwal and @samuelduchesne .

[timtroendle]

@whedon add @samuelduchesne as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, @samuelduchesne is now a reviewer

[timtroendle]

@whedon add @ritwikagarwal as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, @ritwikagarwal is now a reviewer

[timtroendle]

@whedon start review

[whedon]

OK, I've started the review over in #3313.