[PRE REVIEW]: ADaPT-ML: A Data Programming Template for Machine Learning

[whedon]

Submitting author: @nulberry (Andrea Whittaker)
Repository: https://github.com/U-Alberta/ADaPT-ML
Version: v1.0.0
Editor: @jmschrei
Reviewers: @aaronpeikert, @wincowgerDEV
Managing EiC: Kristen Thyng

⚠️ JOSS reduced service mode ⚠️

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/e846e08311cee3886d33101209166f4c"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/e846e08311cee3886d33101209166f4c/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/e846e08311cee3886d33101209166f4c/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/e846e08311cee3886d33101209166f4c)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @nulberry. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@nulberry if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

⚠️ JOSS reduced service mode ⚠️

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@whedon generate pdf

[whedon]

Wordcount for paper.md is 612

[whedon]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1007/s00778-019-00552-1 is OK
- 10.1145/3399579.3399867 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

[whedon]

Software report (experimental):

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.15 s (314.2 files/s, 24069.2 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                          23            311            347           1627
Markdown                         4            137              0            476
YAML                             8             48             10            347
Bourne Shell                     5             21              1             94
TeX                              1              5              0             74
Dockerfile                       3             15              4             69
XML                              1              0              0             12
JSON                             2              0              0              2
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            47            537            362           2701
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Statistical information for the repository 'd9ae149d38be116e6387b351' was
gathered on 2021/12/03.
The following historical commit information, by author, was found:

Author                     Commits    Insertions      Deletions    % of changes
Andrea Whittaker               175          6151           3860          100.00

Below are the number of rows from each author that have survived and are still
intact in the current revision:

Author                     Rows      Stability          Age       % in comments
Andrea Whittaker           2291           37.2          3.1                5.85

[whedon]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[kthyng]

Hi @jmschrei! Would this be a good fit for you?

[kthyng]

@whedon invite @jmschrei as editor

[whedon]

@jmschrei has been invited to edit this submission.

[jmschrei]

I can do this but I am away from my computer for the weekend

…

On Fri, Dec 3, 2021, 12:30 PM whedon ***@***.***> wrote: @jmschrei <https://github.com/jmschrei> has been invited to edit this submission. — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#3975 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AA54IEBDU2STVH4CVM3ROSLUPESHTANCNFSM5JKIRPVA> . Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS <https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675> or Android <https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&referrer=utm_campaign%3Dnotification-email%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dgithub>.

[danielskatz]

Thanks!

[danielskatz]

@whedon assign @jmschrei as editor

[whedon]

OK, the editor is @jmschrei

[jmschrei]

@aaronpeikert are you able to review this submission? The GitHub is mostly in Python but the tool seems to not involve programming that much.

@julianpistorius are you able to review this submission?

[aaronpeikert]

Looks like a great project. Judging from the first glimpse, I am comfortable enough with Python to review it.

[jmschrei]

@whedon invite @aaronpeikert as reviewer

[whedon]

I'm sorry human, I don't understand that. You can see what commands I support by typing:

@whedon commands

[jmschrei]

@whedon add @aaronpeikert as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, @aaronpeikert is now a reviewer

[jmschrei]

Hi @tupi, would you be able to serve as a reviewer for this submission?

[jmschrei]

Hi @wincowgerDEV, would you b able to serve as a reviewer for this submission?

[wincowgerDEV]

I am able to serve as a reviewer for this submission, thanks for the invitation.

[jmschrei]

@whedon add @wincowgerDEV as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, @wincowgerDEV is now a reviewer

[jmschrei]

Great! Let's start.

[jmschrei]

@whedon start review

[whedon]

OK, I've started the review over in #4038.