[PRE REVIEW]: Enlsip.jl: A Julia optimization package to solve constrained nonlinear least-squares problems

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @pierre-borie (Pierre Borie)
Repository: https://github.com/UncertainLab/Enlsip.jl.git
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): joss-paper
Version: v0.9.1
Editor: @jbytecode
Reviewers: @tmigot, @odunbar
Managing EiC: Arfon Smith

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/f3a0b42a11b3169298278bd857c4075d"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/f3a0b42a11b3169298278bd857c4075d/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/f3a0b42a11b3169298278bd857c4075d/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/f3a0b42a11b3169298278bd857c4075d)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @pierre-borie. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@pierre-borie if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.03 s (807.0 files/s, 171592.2 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Julia                            9            838            590           2297
Markdown                         5            159              0            331
TeX                              1             12              0            119
YAML                             4              2              2             89
TOML                             2              5              0             21
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            21           1016            592           2857
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 1099

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1007/BF02591997 is OK
- 10.1137/141000671 is OK
- 10.1137/15M1020575 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.2558627 is OK
- 10.1145/355958.355965 is OK
- 10.1007/s10589-020-00201-2 is OK
- 10.1017/S0962492902000132 is OK
- 10.1137/1.9781611971200 is OK
- 10.1007/978-3-642-48320-2 is OK
- 10.1007/978-0-387-40065-5 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

A Julia package for bilevel optimization problems
Submitting author: @matbesancon
Handling editor: @poulson (Retired)
Reviewers: @HaoZeke, @vissarion
Similarity score: 0.8349

Optim: A mathematical optimization package for Julia
Submitting author: @anriseth
Handling editor: @labarba (Retired)
Reviewers: @ahwillia
Similarity score: 0.8327

DCISolver.jl: A Julia Solver for Nonlinear Optimization using Dynamic Control of Infeasibility
Submitting author: @tmigot
Handling editor: @jbytecode (Active)
Reviewers: @odow, @jbcaillau
Similarity score: 0.8276

LaplaceInterpolation.jl: A Julia package for fast interpolation on a grid
Submitting author: @lootie
Handling editor: @VivianePons (Retired)
Reviewers: @wkearn, @eviatarbach
Similarity score: 0.8141

EnsembleKalmanProcesses.jl: Derivative-free ensemble-based model calibration
Submitting author: @odunbar
Handling editor: @jbytecode (Active)
Reviewers: @odow, @ziyiyin97
Similarity score: 0.8079

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[arfon]

@pierre-borie - thanks for your submission to JOSS. We're currently managing a large backlog of submissions and the editor most appropriate for your area is already rather busy.

For now, we will need to waitlist this paper and process it as the queue reduces. Thanks for your patience!

[pierre-borie]

@arfon, no trouble, I totally understand those issues.
Thanks for your comment!

[jbytecode]

@editorialbot assign me as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @jbytecode is now the editor

[jbytecode]

👋👋👋 Dear @matbesancon, @anriseth, @tmigot, @lootie, @odunbar 👋👋👋

Would you be willing to assist in reviewing this submission for JOSS (Journal of Open Source Software)?

JOSS publishes articles about open source research software. The submission I'd like you to review is titled:

Enlsip.jl: A Julia optimization package to solve constrained nonlinear least-squares problems

You can find more information at the top of this Github issue (#6019).

The review process at JOSS is unique: it takes place in a GitHub issue, is open, and author-reviewer-editor conversations are encouraged. If you have any questions please let me know.

This is the pre-review issue. After setting at least 2 reviewers we will start the review process in a separate thread. In that thread, there will be 23 check items for each single reviewer.

Thank you in advance!

[tmigot]

Hi @jbytecode , that works for me.

[jbytecode]

@editorialbot add @tmigot as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@tmigot added to the reviewers list!

[odunbar]

@jbytecode My apologies, this ping slipped off my radar. However, I'd be happy to review this too.

[jbytecode]

@editorialbot add @odunbar as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@odunbar added to the reviewers list!

[jbytecode]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in #6226.