-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[PRE REVIEW]: hf_hydrodata: A Python package for accessing hydrologic simulations and observations across the United States #6378
Comments
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks. For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
|
|
|
Wordcount for |
Five most similar historical JOSS papers: Integrated hydrologic model development and postprocessing for GSFLOW using pyGSFLOW HydroMT: Automated and reproducible model building and analysis hddtools: Hydrological Data Discovery Tools HRDS: A Python package for hierarchical raster datasets NeuralHydrology --- A Python library for Deep Learning research in hydrology |
Hi @amy-defnet and thanks for your submission! We have a backlog of submissions so I will add this to our waitlist. In the meantime, please suggest 5 reviewers from the database listed above or your own (non-conflicted) extended network. Their github handles are most useful to receive but please don't use "@" to reference them since it will prematurely ping them. Thanks for your patience. |
Hi @kthyng! Thank you so much for the quick update. I am working with my team to be able to suggest 5 reviewers to you and I will update this thread once we have those. |
Hi @kthyng - my team suggests the following as potential reviewers (as their github handle) from the JOSS reviewer database: rreinecke, JannisHoch, kellykochanski, dvalters, jlarsen-usgs. Thanks! |
@rwegener2 would you be up for editing this submission? |
@editorialbot invite @rwegener2 as editor |
Invitation to edit this submission sent! |
@editorialbot assign me as editor |
Assigned! @rwegener2 is now the editor |
👋 @shulele would you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html |
👋 @thodson-usgs would you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html |
Sure, this is right up my alley. |
Lovely, thank you! I'll add you as a reviewer. Once we get an additional reviewer you will get another set of notifications and at that point a review ticket will be opened for you to begin your review. |
@editorialbot add @thodson-usgs as reviewer |
@thodson-usgs added to the reviewers list! |
👋 @puruckertom would you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html |
👋🏻 @jmp75, would you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html |
👋🏻 @raoulcollenteur, would you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html |
👋🏻 @alessandroamaranto, would you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html |
Sure!
Ale
…On Mon, Apr 15, 2024, 21:04 Rachel Wegener ***@***.***> wrote:
👋🏻 @alessandroamaranto <https://github.com/alessandroamaranto>, would
you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our
checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines:
https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#6378 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADJOC4PKDECAQVTDIB3GLY3Y5QQERAVCNFSM6AAAAABDPZXWRGVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDANJXGYYTAOBQG4>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Great, thanks @alessandroamaranto! |
@editorialbot add @alessandroamaranto as reviewer |
@alessandroamaranto added to the reviewers list! |
@editorialbot start review |
OK, I've started the review over in #6623. |
Submitting author: @amy-defnet (Amy Defnet)
Repository: https://github.com/hydroframe/hf_hydrodata
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version: v1.1.0
Editor: @rwegener2
Reviewers: @thodson-usgs, @alessandroamaranto
Managing EiC: Kristen Thyng
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @amy-defnet. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@amy-defnet if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: