-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 161
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Travel Fund - Promotion to Stage-1 #278
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A bit nitpicky, but this is the first/only non-meeting-notes document we have that refers to the foundation as "OpenJSF", which at least to me sounds like a mouthful. Could/should we come up with something like a style guide that would address this?
Co-Authored-By: Eemeli Aro <eemeli@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: Eemeli Aro <eemeli@gmail.com>
Will review soon. FWIW the text of the document doesn't need to have consensus to reach stage one. IMHO this is already ready for stage 1 and we are mostly discussing stage 2 concerns. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As this is stage 1, lgtm?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM for stage 1
As discussed in today's CPC meeting. This PR can be landed in 48 hours if there are no objections. |
Co-Authored-By: Myles Borins <myles.borins@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: Myles Borins <myles.borins@gmail.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Given that we have listed the expenses so far in the Node.js Travel fund, we should update them again once this reaches stage 4. Would you mind adding that in the "what is necessary to complete this proposal"?
Co-Authored-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
…l into travel-fund
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Thanks all! |
Second stage in a 4 stage process for a proposal.
This proposal is to move governance of the Foundation Travel Fund to the Cross Project Council.
In the last PR, we were just setting up the general purpose of the proposal. In this PR, we can focus on the details of how the fund should be managed. I've included the relevant files from the nodejs/admin repo in this PR, and have made some proposed changes already. Since the files are added in this PR, here is a better diff for viewing the changes I've made:
https://github.com/openjs-foundation/cross-project-council/compare/c9332b8...Jonahss:travel-fund?expand=1
Ideally, I'd like to keep the process as similar to the existing process as possible, but some changes have already been suggested and we should discuss those, as well as budgeting safeguards.
In order to inform the discussion, I'm working on surveying the projects for how they anticipate how they may use the travel fund in the upcoming year. I will also provide some analysis of the past few years of fund usage.
PR for previous stage: #268
Addresses #172
@mentions for those who had comments on the previous PR which we said we'd discuss here:
@mcollina, @joyeecheung, @bnb,