-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[META] Search Pipelines - GA #6278
Comments
Commenting here, since I can't edit the issue to enumerate the tasks that need to be completed in time for a 2.7 release:
I'll create tasks for each of these, which we can link from the issue description. |
Thinking that the META issue could be a long lived list of processors to create. Each issue linked to that could be assigned to a release as we prioritize. Feel free to reassign tasks. |
Some other feastures
|
This issue tracks task that need to be completed to before search pipelines are generally available, like metrics, documentation, integration w/ OpenSearch Dashboards. |
I'm removing a couple of line items @noCharger do you think that the three features here #6278 (comment) are critical for GA? |
Nope, 3 is done. 1 and 2 are supportive features. |
Search Pipelines is GA in 2.9 |
This issue tracks all work that must be included for us to make Search Pipelines generally available.
Search Pipelines will enable builders to configure an ordered list of processors that take queries, results, or both to enable transformations that typically occur in client applications either before queries are submitted to OpenSearch or after results are retrieved. This feature will make it easy to integrate and test result re-rankers, query re-writers, and other features to send data to other applications. We also want to enable features like running multiple pipelines per index, comparing results between pipelines, and setting a default pipeline for an index.
This will enable partners to more easily integrate their features with OpenSearch and empower customers to focus more energy on building their applications and less time integrating/building custom processors.
Describe alternatives you've considered
See opensearch-project/search-processor#80 for the RFC for the project. We want your feedback!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: