Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix: bump byte buddy version from 1.15.4 to 1.15.10 #466

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 21, 2024

Conversation

yuye-aws
Copy link
Member

@yuye-aws yuye-aws commented Nov 21, 2024

Description

bump byte buddy version from 1.15.4 to 1.15.10

Related Issues

Resolves module conflict introduced by this PR: opensearch-project/OpenSearch#16655

* What went wrong:
Execution failed for task ':compileTestJava'.
> Could not resolve all dependencies for configuration ':testCompileClasspath'.
   > Conflict found for the following module:
       - net.bytebuddy:byte-buddy between versions 1.15.10 and 1.15.4

Check List

  • New functionality includes testing.
  • New functionality has been documented.
  • API changes companion pull request created.
  • Commits are signed per the DCO using --signoff.
  • Public documentation issue/PR created.

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

Signed-off-by: yuye-aws <yuyezhu@amazon.com>
@yuye-aws
Copy link
Member Author

@yuye-aws
Copy link
Member Author

There is no need to backport the PR to 2.x because the following commits only happen in the main branch.
image

@zane-neo zane-neo merged commit 34d2005 into opensearch-project:main Nov 21, 2024
7 of 10 checks passed
opensearch-trigger-bot bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 21, 2024
Signed-off-by: yuye-aws <yuyezhu@amazon.com>
(cherry picked from commit 34d2005)
Signed-off-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants