Integ relevance function it fix

[forestmvey]

Description

Integration test failing with base class using JUnit4. Integration test queries required FROM clause in SELECT statements.

Check List

• New functionality includes testing.
• All tests pass, including unit test, integration test and doctest
• Commits are signed per the DCO using --signoff

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #608 (5627112) into main (6fda8f7) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               main     #608   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     94.59%   94.59%           
- Complexity     2742     2743    +1     
=========================================
  Files           276      276           
  Lines          7454     7455    +1     
  Branches        550      552    +2     
=========================================
+ Hits           7051     7052    +1     
  Misses          349      349           
  Partials         54       54           

Flag	Coverage Δ
query-workbench	62.76% <ø> (ø)
sql-engine	97.67% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...java/org/opensearch/sql/ppl/parser/AstBuilder.java	100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...opensearch/planner/physical/MLCommonsOperator.java	12.12% <0.00%> (ø)
...rch/planner/physical/MLCommonsOperatorActions.java	1.75% <0.00%> (ø)

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 6fda8f7...5627112. Read the comment docs.

[joshuali925]

lgtm, thanks

[dai-chen]

Thanks for the fix! Just curious how this IT (without FROM clause) can pass earlier?

[forestmvey]

Thanks for the fix! Just curious how this IT (without FROM clause) can pass earlier?

Integration tests are based on JUnit4, not JUnit5 so the test was not being run.