Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove double check for toRef and added checks for fromRef field #1804

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 31, 2024

Conversation

zakisk
Copy link
Contributor

@zakisk zakisk commented Oct 31, 2024

removed double checks in payload validation for toRef field in bitbucker server event payload and added checks for fromRef field and added test accordingly.

Changes

Submitter Checklist

  • 📝 Please ensure your commit message is clear and informative. For guidance on crafting effective commit messages, refer to the How to write a git commit message guide. We prefer the commit message to be included in the PR body itself rather than a link to an external website (ie: Jira ticket).

  • ♽ Before submitting a PR, run make test lint to avoid unnecessary CI processing. For an even more efficient workflow, consider installing pre-commit and running pre-commit install in the root of this repository.

  • ✨ We use linters to maintain clean and consistent code. Please ensure you've run make lint before submitting a PR. Some linters offer a --fix mode, which can be executed with the command make fix-linters (ensure markdownlint and golangci-lint tools are installed first).

  • 📖 If you're introducing a user-facing feature or changing existing behavior, please ensure it's properly documented.

  • 🧪 While 100% coverage isn't a requirement, we encourage unit tests for any code changes where possible.

  • 🎁 If feasible, please check if an end-to-end test can be added. See README for more details.

  • 🔎 If there's any flakiness in the CI tests, don't necessarily ignore it. It's better to address the issue before merging, or provide a valid reason to bypass it if fixing isn't possible (e.g., token rate limitations).

removed double checks in payload validation for toRef
field in bitbucker server event payload and added checks
for fromRef field and added test accordingly.

Signed-off-by: Zaki Shaikh <zashaikh@redhat.com>
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 31, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 65.16%. Comparing base (549b2d8) to head (0a7143d).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1804      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   65.08%   65.16%   +0.08%     
==========================================
  Files         175      175              
  Lines       13481    13487       +6     
==========================================
+ Hits         8774     8789      +15     
+ Misses       4120     4114       -6     
+ Partials      587      584       -3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@chmouel
Copy link
Member

chmouel commented Oct 31, 2024

can you double check with manual testing ? running a PR with a .tekton dir and see if it reacts and run a /retest to see if it reacts as well

@zakisk
Copy link
Contributor Author

zakisk commented Oct 31, 2024

@chmouel deployed controller with this PR's code and send /retest on a pull request on bitbucket server and it was working fine as it was.

@chmouel chmouel merged commit e2ea074 into openshift-pipelines:main Oct 31, 2024
4 checks passed
@zakisk zakisk deleted the change-toref-to-fromref branch October 31, 2024 15:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants