Skip to content

Conversation

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

This is an automated cherry-pick of #114

/assign mpatlasov

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-67186 has been cloned as Jira Issue OCPBUGS-67305. Will retitle bug to link to clone.
/retitle [release-4.21] OCPBUGS-67305: fix: disk creation failure in AzureStack env

Details

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #114

/assign mpatlasov

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot changed the title [release-4.21] OCPBUGS-67186: fix: disk creation failure in AzureStack env [release-4.21] OCPBUGS-67305: fix: disk creation failure in AzureStack env Dec 12, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Dec 12, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-67305, which is invalid:

  • release note text must be set and not match the template OR release note type must be set to "Release Note Not Required". For more information you can reference the OpenShift Bug Process.
  • expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-67186 to target a version in 4.22.0, but it targets "4.21" instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #114

/assign mpatlasov

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from mpatlasov and rhrmo December 12, 2025 16:28
@mpatlasov
Copy link

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@mpatlasov: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-67305, which is invalid:

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@mpatlasov
Copy link

expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-67186 to target a version in 4.22.0, but it targets "4.21" instead

When trying to update it in JIRA to 4.22.0, got "Version with id '4.22.0' does not exist." from JIRA

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 13, 2025

@gpei: This PR was included in a payload test run from openshift/installer#10159
trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

  • periodic-ci-openshift-openshift-tests-private-release-4.21-amd64-nightly-azure-stack-ipi-f28

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/5a43cbf0-d7f4-11f0-998d-1518920a4393-0

@openshift-cherrypick-robot openshift-cherrypick-robot force-pushed the cherry-pick-114-to-release-4.21 branch from 01b8eaf to e8b236d Compare December 15, 2025 06:21
@Phaow
Copy link

Phaow commented Dec 15, 2025

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@Phaow: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-67305, which is invalid:

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@Phaow
Copy link

Phaow commented Dec 15, 2025

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Dec 15, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@Phaow: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-67305, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

7 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.21.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.21.0)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
  • release note text is set and does not match the template
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-67186 is in the state ON_QA, which is one of the valid states (MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED)
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-67186 targets the "4.22.0" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.22.0
  • bug has dependents

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira (wduan@redhat.com), skipping review request.

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@Phaow
Copy link

Phaow commented Dec 15, 2025

/testwith openshift/azure-disk-csi-driver/master/e2e-azurestack-csi openshift/cloud-provider-azure#152

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 15, 2025

@Phaow, testwith: could not generate prow job. ERROR:

no ref for requested test included in command. The org, repo, and branch containing the requested test need to be targeted by at least one of the included PRs

@Phaow
Copy link

Phaow commented Dec 15, 2025

/testwith openshift/azure-disk-csi-driver/release-4.21/e2e-azurestack-csi openshift/cloud-provider-azure#152

@Phaow
Copy link

Phaow commented Dec 15, 2025

/retest-required

@Phaow
Copy link

Phaow commented Dec 15, 2025

/testwith openshift/azure-disk-csi-driver/release-4.21/e2e-azurestack-csi openshift/cloud-provider-azure#152

@Phaow
Copy link

Phaow commented Dec 15, 2025

/retest-required

@Phaow
Copy link

Phaow commented Dec 15, 2025

/testwith openshift/azure-disk-csi-driver/release-4.21/e2e-azurestack-csi openshift/cloud-provider-azure#152

@mpatlasov
Copy link

/test e2e-azurestack-csi

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 15, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 15, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: mpatlasov, openshift-cherrypick-robot

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Dec 15, 2025
@Phaow
Copy link

Phaow commented Dec 16, 2025

/tide refresh

@Phaow
Copy link

Phaow commented Dec 16, 2025

The tide seems stuck Waiting for status to be reported — Not mergeable. No Tide query for branch release-4.21 found.

@Phaow
Copy link

Phaow commented Dec 16, 2025

/verified by CI
The failure cases are caused by system issue Unable to connect to the server (ASH vpn is not stable enough).

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria label Dec 16, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@Phaow: This PR has been marked as verified by [CI](https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/test-platform-results/logs/multi-pr-openshift-azure-disk-csi-driver-116-openshift-cloud-provider-azure-152-e2e-azurestack-csi/2000544538753503232).

Details

In response to this:

/verified by CI
The failure cases are caused by system issue Unable to connect to the server (ASH vpn is not stable enough).

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@Phaow
Copy link

Phaow commented Dec 16, 2025

/test all

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 16, 2025

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-azurestack-csi e8b236d link false /test e2e-azurestack-csi

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@Phaow
Copy link

Phaow commented Dec 16, 2025

/hold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Dec 16, 2025
@Phaow
Copy link

Phaow commented Dec 17, 2025

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Dec 17, 2025
@damdo
Copy link
Member

damdo commented Dec 17, 2025

/tide refresh

@damdo
Copy link
Member

damdo commented Dec 17, 2025

openshift/release#72652 merged now

@Phaow
Copy link

Phaow commented Dec 17, 2025

/label backport-risk-assessed

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 17, 2025

@Phaow: Can not set label backport-risk-assessed: Must be member in one of these teams: [openshift-patch-managers openshift-release-oversight openshift-staff-engineers openshift-sustaining-engineers]

Details

In response to this:

/label backport-risk-assessed

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@damdo
Copy link
Member

damdo commented Dec 17, 2025

@sdodson is backporting to 4.21 on freeze even for bugs? TY

@jsafrane
Copy link

IMHO the freeze applies only to features. We still need to fix bugs, especially this one that make upgrade to 4.21 working on Azure Stack Hub.

/label backport-risk-assessed label

@jsafrane
Copy link

/label backport-risk-assessed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. label Dec 17, 2025
@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 95614db into openshift:release-4.21 Dec 17, 2025
9 of 11 checks passed
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Jira Issue Verification Checks: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-67305
✔️ This pull request was pre-merge verified.
✔️ All associated pull requests have merged.
✔️ All associated, merged pull requests were pre-merge verified.

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-67305 has been moved to the MODIFIED state and will move to the VERIFIED state when the change is available in an accepted nightly payload. 🕓

Details

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #114

/assign mpatlasov

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@sdodson
Copy link
Member

sdodson commented Dec 17, 2025

@sdodson is backporting to 4.21 on freeze even for bugs? TY

No, always feel free to backport bug fixes especially when associated with a release blocker.

@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link

Fix included in accepted release 4.21.0-0.nightly-2025-12-18-020818

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.