Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

UPSTREAM: <carry>: openshift: Remove cluster from machine.openshift.io #35

Conversation

enxebre
Copy link
Member

@enxebre enxebre commented Apr 30, 2019

since we mirror the upstream even we don't leverage it we initially put a cluster struct under machine.openshit.io
This removes this object from our user facing API completely, which means actuators would need to receive the one in cluster.k8s.io in the interface openshift/cluster-api-provider-aws@c697afa#diff-acdcd15b24a848e93a682408b101755fL107

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Apr 30, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. label Apr 30, 2019
@enxebre
Copy link
Member Author

enxebre commented Apr 30, 2019

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Apr 30, 2019
@spangenberg
Copy link

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 30, 2019
@ingvagabund
Copy link
Member

Acceptable to switch to the upstream group for the cluster given we don't use it. Seamless change.

/approve

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ingvagabund

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 30, 2019
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 0b649f4 into openshift:openshift-4.0-cluster-api-0.0.0-alpha.4 Apr 30, 2019
enxebre added a commit to enxebre/cluster-api-provider-libvirt-1 that referenced this pull request May 3, 2019
enxebre added a commit to enxebre/cluster-api-provider-libvirt-1 that referenced this pull request May 3, 2019
openshift/cluster-api#35 dropped the cluster object from machine.openshift.io as the cluster object is still required programatically via actuator interface this uses the one under cluster.k8s.io
enxebre added a commit to enxebre/cluster-api-provider-libvirt-1 that referenced this pull request May 3, 2019
openshift/cluster-api#35 dropped the cluster object from machine.openshift.io as the cluster object is still required programatically via actuator interface this uses the one under cluster.k8s.io
enxebre added a commit to enxebre/cluster-api-provider-libvirt-1 that referenced this pull request May 3, 2019
openshift/cluster-api#35 dropped the cluster object from machine.openshift.io as the cluster object is still required programatically via actuator interface this uses the one under cluster.k8s.io
enxebre added a commit to enxebre/cluster-api-provider-libvirt-1 that referenced this pull request May 3, 2019
openshift/cluster-api#35 dropped the cluster object from machine.openshift.io as the cluster object is still required programatically via actuator interface this uses the one under cluster.k8s.io
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants