Bug 1908145: Add workloads localhost ports for recovery-controllers #569
Conversation
|
@damemi: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1908145, which is valid. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
openshift-ci-robot
added
bugzilla/severity-high
| @@ -121,10 +121,12 @@ Ports are assumed to be used on all nodes in all clusters unless otherwise speci | |||
| |-------|-----------|-------------|-------|-------| | |||
| | 4180 | machine-config-daemon oauth-proxy | node || | |||
| | 8797 | machine-config-daemon | node |4.0| metrics | | |||
| | 9443 | kube-controller-manager | workloads || recovery-controller| | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think this should be in near the KAS https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/pull/569/files#diff-622c5939f9f7beba1c96c9d2fd6e5b2a8c457f9be706a473da0cf7db9f34a51eR77 as it also listens on 0.0.0.0
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Could you clarify what you mean? I don't see KAS listed for 0.0.0.0 in this doc
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: soltysh The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
openshift-ci-robot
added
the
approved
|
@damemi: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Bugzilla bug 1908145 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
This adds the updated port, as recommended in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1908145#c1 and changed in openshift/cluster-kube-scheduler-operator#311