-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 34
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
OCPBUGS-36797: Revisit links to upstream docs in API #226
OCPBUGS-36797: Revisit links to upstream docs in API #226
Conversation
alebedev87
commented
Aug 28, 2024
•
edited
Loading
edited
- Removed links that don't add value and may mislead users (AWS, Infoblox: secret format).
- Pinned remaining links to specific commits and anchored them to relevant chapters.
@alebedev87: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-36797, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
/jira refresh |
@alebedev87: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-36797, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
As this is doc link removal, QE will verify this after the merger.... |
/assign @Miciah |
@alebedev87: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-36797, which is valid. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
@@ -304,7 +300,7 @@ type ExternalDNSAzureProviderOptions struct { | |||
// } | |||
// | |||
// See | |||
// https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/external-dns/blob/master/docs/tutorials/azure.md | |||
// https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/external-dns/blob/226dbb931f7a2019810b3703aec096c4ea4f40ea/docs/tutorials/azure.md#configuration-file |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is fine for now, but I hope in the future we will have some product documentation that we can reference instead.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My goal was to show which fields can be put into the config. The previous link was a shot in the dark, this change makes the link at least useful. Btw, the config content is kinda opaque for the operator as we don't validate or enforce anything for the moment. But I agree the ultimate goal is to have this in the OCP docs.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@jmanthei : Can you help us with adding of the Azure config file for EzternalDNS' Azure provider to the docs?
UPD: AWS, GCP and Infoblox would need to be there too.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@alebedev87 I'm happy to help- do you have links to existing config files for these that I can glean information from? How soon does this need to be done?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@jmanthei: We can take the upstream links as example. For instance this one from the PR for Azure.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How soon does this need to be done?
It's not urgent.
// See | ||
// https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/external-dns/blob/master/docs/tutorials/bluecat.md | ||
// https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/external-dns/blob/226dbb931f7a2019810b3703aec096c4ea4f40ea/docs/tutorials/bluecat.md#using-json-configuration-file | ||
// for more information on the necessary configuration values and how to obtain them. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The linked documentation just seems to say which fields are required and which are not, but not how to obtain them. I think this change is fine since the goal is just to fix the link, but as I mentioned in my other comment, it would be good in the future to link to product documentation instead.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Right, this one was really for consistency (with Azure). Btw BlueCat is going away so we don't need to bother about it.
Thanks! |
/approve Wake up, Neo ... |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: alebedev87, Miciah The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
- Removed links that don't add value and may mislead users. - Pinned remaining links to specific commits and anchored them to relevant chapters.
/retest-required |
dafa06e
to
dd227ae
Compare
/test e2e-gcp-operator |
Synchronizes the File-Based Catalog (FBC) with infrastructure annotations from the latest bundle. This update resolves `make verify` target failures by regenerating the catalog via `make catalog`.
dd227ae
to
af77cf2
Compare
/test e2e-aws-shared-vpc-phz-operator |
@alebedev87: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
Thanks! |
@alebedev87: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-36797: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-36797 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |