-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 95
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bug 1949907: Gather summary of PodNetworkConnectivityChecks #374
Conversation
373a0ee
to
543d26a
Compare
051348e
to
17299cb
Compare
/retest |
docs/insights-archive-sample/config/podnetworkconnectivitychecks.json
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
1219d4c
to
292c9e7
Compare
/test e2e |
/retest |
pkg/gather/clusterconfig/pod_network_connectivity_checks_test.go
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
/retest |
Apparently Go has a nice idiomatic way of doing this task which is usually quite ugly in most other languages.
I went through the code and ran it locally. Thanks! |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: natiiix, tremes The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
@natiiix: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1949907, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@natiiix: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1949907, which is valid. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
3 similar comments
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
@natiiix: The following test failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
1 similar comment
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
@natiiix: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Bugzilla bug 1949907 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
🎉 That took an awful lot of attempts to pass the CI. 🙃 |
This PR implements a new data enhancement for gathering a summary of
PodNetworkConnectivityChecks
. Time of the most recently failed check with each reason and message is recorded in the IO archive. This enhancement is proactive and will not be backported.Categories
Sample archive
docs/insights-archive-sample/config/podnetworkconnectivitychecks.json
Documentation
docs/gathered-data.md
- "PNCC" sectionUnit Tests
pkg/gather/clusterconfig/pod_network_connectivity_checks_test.go
-Test_PNCC
Privacy
Changelog
No.
References
Jira Task: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CCXDEV-4192
Bugzilla Bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1949907