Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 1949907: Gather summary of PodNetworkConnectivityChecks #374

Merged
merged 20 commits into from
Apr 24, 2021

Conversation

natiiix
Copy link
Contributor

@natiiix natiiix commented Mar 12, 2021

This PR implements a new data enhancement for gathering a summary of PodNetworkConnectivityChecks. Time of the most recently failed check with each reason and message is recorded in the IO archive. This enhancement is proactive and will not be backported.

Categories

  • Bugfix
  • Enhancement
  • Backporting
  • Others (CI, Infrastructure, Documentation)

Sample archive

  • docs/insights-archive-sample/config/podnetworkconnectivitychecks.json

Documentation

  • docs/gathered-data.md - "PNCC" section

Unit Tests

  • pkg/gather/clusterconfig/pod_network_connectivity_checks_test.go - Test_PNCC

Privacy

⚠️ Gathered data may contain external IP addresses and ports of services (i.e., when an important service is unreachable). ⚠️

Changelog

No.

References

Jira Task: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CCXDEV-4192
Bugzilla Bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1949907

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Mar 12, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Mar 12, 2021
@natiiix natiiix marked this pull request as draft March 12, 2021 15:16
@natiiix natiiix force-pushed the pncc branch 2 times, most recently from 373a0ee to 543d26a Compare April 6, 2021 08:31
@natiiix natiiix force-pushed the pncc branch 2 times, most recently from 051348e to 17299cb Compare April 13, 2021 08:22
@natiiix natiiix changed the title WIP: PodNetworkConnectivityChecks Gather summary of PodNetworkConnectivityChecks Apr 13, 2021
@natiiix natiiix marked this pull request as ready for review April 13, 2021 08:35
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Apr 13, 2021
@natiiix
Copy link
Contributor Author

natiiix commented Apr 14, 2021

/retest
No idea why they're failing. The 503 status is suspicious and doesn't seem like an IO-related problem.

@natiiix natiiix force-pushed the pncc branch 2 times, most recently from 1219d4c to 292c9e7 Compare April 16, 2021 15:17
@natiiix
Copy link
Contributor Author

natiiix commented Apr 19, 2021

/test e2e

@natiiix
Copy link
Contributor Author

natiiix commented Apr 20, 2021

/retest

@tremes
Copy link
Contributor

tremes commented Apr 23, 2021

/retest

@tremes
Copy link
Contributor

tremes commented Apr 23, 2021

I went through the code and ran it locally. Thanks!
/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: natiiix, tremes

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 23, 2021
@natiiix natiiix changed the title Gather summary of PodNetworkConnectivityChecks Bug 1949907: Gather summary of PodNetworkConnectivityChecks Apr 23, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/severity-low Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is low for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Apr 23, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@natiiix: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1949907, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.8.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.8.0)
  • bug is in the state NEW, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @psimovec

In response to this:

Bug 1949907: Gather summary of PodNetworkConnectivityChecks

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@natiiix: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1949907, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.8.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.8.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @psimovec

In response to this:

Bug 1949907: Gather summary of PodNetworkConnectivityChecks

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

3 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 24, 2021

@natiiix: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-upgrade 74b4902 link /test e2e-gcp-upgrade

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

1 similar comment
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 0f5d26c into openshift:master Apr 24, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@natiiix: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 1949907 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1949907: Gather summary of PodNetworkConnectivityChecks

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@natiiix
Copy link
Contributor Author

natiiix commented Apr 26, 2021

🎉 That took an awful lot of attempts to pass the CI. 🙃

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-low Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is low for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants