-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 98
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bug 2011822: obfuscation ovn clusters bug #515
Bug 2011822: obfuscation ovn clusters bug #515
Conversation
// nolint:lll | ||
// https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.8/networking/ovn_kubernetes_network_provider/configuring-egress-ips-ovn.html#configuring-egress-ips-ovn | ||
if len(hostSubnets) == 0 { | ||
networks = append(networks, "192.168.126.0/18") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Interesting.... :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
OK so right now we have only OVN and SDN right? So this should be hopefully safe now (which might change in the future if there will be some another case when there are no hostsubnets.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yup
I tried on 4.8 OVN cluster with enabled opt-in obfuscation and it worked good. Thank you! |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: Sergey1011010, tremes The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
1 similar comment
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
@Sergey1011010: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2009322, which is invalid:
Comment In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
@Sergey1011010: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2009322, which is invalid:
Comment In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@Sergey1011010: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2011822, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Bugzilla (dmisharo@redhat.com), skipping review request. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
2 similar comments
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
@Sergey1011010: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Bugzilla bug 2011822 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Categories
Sample Archive
No changes
Documentation
No changes
Unit Tests
No changes
Privacy
No new data was collected
Changelog
No
Breaking Changes
No
References
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CCXDEV-6055
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2011822
https://access.redhat.com/solutions/???