CHANGELOG: Document changes since v0.9.0 #1064

wking · 2019-01-15T00:20:56Z

Through 63bdb7f (#1050).

abhinavdahiya · 2019-01-15T01:07:44Z

/approve

looks good.

wking · 2019-01-15T02:09:24Z

6 error level events were detected during this test run:

Jan 15 01:30:16.732 E kube-apiserver Kube API started failing: Get https://ci-op-5979kimc-1d3f3-api.origin-ci-int-aws.dev.rhcloud.com:6443/api/v1/namespaces/kube-system?timeout=3s: context deadline exceeded (Client.Timeout exceeded while awaiting headers)
Jan 15 01:34:20.521 E kube-apiserver Kube API started failing: Get https://ci-op-5979kimc-1d3f3-api.origin-ci-int-aws.dev.rhcloud.com:6443/api/v1/namespaces/kube-system?timeout=3s: context deadline exceeded
Jan 15 01:34:47.732 E kube-apiserver Kube API started failing: Get https://ci-op-5979kimc-1d3f3-api.origin-ci-int-aws.dev.rhcloud.com:6443/api/v1/namespaces/kube-system?timeout=3s: context deadline exceeded (Client.Timeout exceeded while awaiting headers)
Jan 15 01:34:48.732 - 30s   E kube-apiserver Kube API is not responding to GET requests
Jan 15 01:35:17.733 E kube-apiserver Kube API started failing: Get https://ci-op-5979kimc-1d3f3-api.origin-ci-int-aws.dev.rhcloud.com:6443/api/v1/namespaces/kube-system?timeout=3s: context deadline exceeded (Client.Timeout exceeded while awaiting headers)
Jan 15 01:39:19.732 E kube-apiserver Kube API started failing: Get https://ci-op-5979kimc-1d3f3-api.origin-ci-int-aws.dev.rhcloud.com:6443/api/v1/namespaces/kube-system?timeout=3s: context deadline exceeded (Client.Timeout exceeded while awaiting headers)

/retest

abhinavdahiya · 2019-01-15T02:34:19Z

/lgtm

/hold

crawford · 2019-01-15T02:55:08Z

CHANGELOG.md

+ cluster network.
+- On OpenStack, the machine(set) templates have been updated to set
+ `cloudName` and some other properties.
+- On libvirt, `destroy cluster` is not more robust in the face of


s/not/now/

Thanks :). Fixed with 2cbe0f8 -> 997f778. Can you drop a fresh /lgtm?

crawford · 2019-01-15T03:02:47Z

/lgtm

Through 63bdb7f (Merge pull request openshift#1050 from ironcladlou/trouble-doc, 2019-01-14).

wking · 2019-01-15T17:48:16Z

I've pushed 997f778 -> 68692df, bumping the release date to today. @crawford, can I get a fresh /lgtm?

abhinavdahiya · 2019-01-15T18:11:35Z

/lgtm

I've pushed 997f778 -> 68692df, bumping the release date to today. @crawford, can I get a fresh /lgtm?

openshift-ci-robot · 2019-01-15T18:11:46Z

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: abhinavdahiya, crawford, wking

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

~~OWNERS~~ [abhinavdahiya,crawford,wking]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

wking · 2019-01-15T18:15:36Z

/hold cancel

We're about to tag 0.10.0 on top of this via #1068.

wking · 2019-01-15T19:04:32Z

e2e-aws:

fail [k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/storage/pvc_protection.go:61]: Failed waiting for PVC to be bound PersistentVolumeClaim pvc-mw6ll not in phase Bound within 3m0s
Expected error:
    <*errors.errorString | 0xc4210aae80>: {
        s: "PersistentVolumeClaim pvc-mw6ll not in phase Bound within 3m0s",
    }
    PersistentVolumeClaim pvc-mw6ll not in phase Bound within 3m0s
not to have occurred

and two other volume-related errors.

/retest

openshift-bot · 2019-01-15T19:42:08Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

wking · 2019-01-15T19:45:13Z

e2e-aws error was:

level=error msg="Error: Error applying plan:"
level=error
level=error msg="1 error occurred:"
level=error msg="\t* module.vpc.aws_lb.api_external: 1 error occurred:"
level=error msg="\t* aws_lb.api_external: timeout while waiting for state to become 'active' (timeout: 10m0s)"

wking · 2019-01-15T21:28:32Z

e2e-aws:

fail [github.com/openshift/origin/test/extended/deployments/deployments.go:388]: Expected
    <string>: --> pre: Running hook pod ...
    test pre hook executed
to contain substring
    <string>: deployment-test-2 up to 1

...
failed: (3m5s) 2019-01-15T20:31:02 "[Feature:DeploymentConfig] deploymentconfigs with test deployments [Conformance] should run a deployment to completion and then scale to zero [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel/minimal]"

and more.

/retest

wking · 2019-01-15T23:42:13Z

e2e-aws:

Failing tests:

[Area:Networking] multicast when using one of the plugins 'redhat/openshift-ovs-multitenant, redhat/openshift-ovs-networkpolicy' should allow multicast traffic in namespaces where it is enabled [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]
[Feature:Builds][Conformance] imagechangetriggers imagechangetriggers should trigger builds of all types [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel/minimal]
[Feature:DeploymentConfig] deploymentconfigs when run iteratively [Conformance] should immediately start a new deployment [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel/minimal]
[sig-apps] StatefulSet [k8s.io] Basic StatefulSet functionality [StatefulSetBasic] should implement legacy replacement when the update strategy is OnDelete [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel] [Suite:k8s]
[sig-apps] StatefulSet [k8s.io] Basic StatefulSet functionality [StatefulSetBasic] should not deadlock when a pod's predecessor fails [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel] [Suite:k8s]
[sig-apps] StatefulSet [k8s.io] Basic StatefulSet functionality [StatefulSetBasic] should perform rolling updates and roll backs of template modifications [Conformance] [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel/minimal] [Suite:k8s]
[sig-scheduling] ResourceQuota should create a ResourceQuota and capture the life of a service. [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel] [Suite:k8s]

/retest

wking · 2019-01-16T00:24:36Z

e2e-aws:

level=error
level=error msg="Error: Error applying plan:"
level=error
level=error msg="1 error occurred:"
level=error msg="\t* module.vpc.aws_lb_listener.api_internal_api: 1 error occurred:"
level=error msg="\t* aws_lb_listener.api_internal_api: Error retrieving Listener: timeout while waiting for state to become 'success' (timeout: 1m0s)"

/retest

wking · 2019-01-16T00:58:26Z

e2e-aws:

level=error msg="Error: Error applying plan:"
level=error
level=error msg="1 error occurred:"
level=error msg="\t* module.vpc.aws_lb.api_internal: 1 error occurred:"
level=error msg="\t* aws_lb.api_internal: timeout while waiting for state to become 'active' (last state: 'provisioning', timeout: 10m0s)"

Sigh.

/retest

wking · 2019-01-16T01:59:22Z

/retest

wking · 2019-01-16T04:04:29Z

woo, finally

openshift-ci-robot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jan 15, 2019

openshift-ci-robot requested review from hardys and russellb January 15, 2019 00:21

openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 15, 2019

wking force-pushed the version-0.10.0 branch from 37b81f6 to 2cbe0f8 Compare January 15, 2019 00:48

openshift-ci-robot assigned abhinavdahiya Jan 15, 2019

openshift-ci-robot added do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. labels Jan 15, 2019

crawford reviewed Jan 15, 2019

View reviewed changes

wking force-pushed the version-0.10.0 branch from 2cbe0f8 to 997f778 Compare January 15, 2019 03:01

openshift-ci-robot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 15, 2019

openshift-ci-robot assigned crawford Jan 15, 2019

openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 15, 2019

CHANGELOG: Document changes since v0.9.0

68692df

Through 63bdb7f (Merge pull request openshift#1050 from ironcladlou/trouble-doc, 2019-01-14).

wking force-pushed the version-0.10.0 branch from 997f778 to 68692df Compare January 15, 2019 17:47

openshift-ci-robot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 15, 2019

openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 15, 2019

openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jan 15, 2019

openshift-merge-robot merged commit 3af001d into openshift:master Jan 16, 2019

wking deleted the version-0.10.0 branch January 17, 2019 00:28

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

CHANGELOG: Document changes since v0.9.0 #1064

CHANGELOG: Document changes since v0.9.0 #1064

wking commented Jan 15, 2019

abhinavdahiya commented Jan 15, 2019

wking commented Jan 15, 2019

abhinavdahiya commented Jan 15, 2019

crawford Jan 15, 2019

wking Jan 15, 2019

crawford commented Jan 15, 2019

wking commented Jan 15, 2019

abhinavdahiya commented Jan 15, 2019

openshift-ci-robot commented Jan 15, 2019

wking commented Jan 15, 2019

wking commented Jan 15, 2019

openshift-bot commented Jan 15, 2019

wking commented Jan 15, 2019

wking commented Jan 15, 2019

wking commented Jan 15, 2019

wking commented Jan 16, 2019

wking commented Jan 16, 2019

wking commented Jan 16, 2019

wking commented Jan 16, 2019

CHANGELOG: Document changes since v0.9.0 #1064

CHANGELOG: Document changes since v0.9.0 #1064

Conversation

wking commented Jan 15, 2019

abhinavdahiya commented Jan 15, 2019

wking commented Jan 15, 2019

abhinavdahiya commented Jan 15, 2019

crawford Jan 15, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

wking Jan 15, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

crawford commented Jan 15, 2019

wking commented Jan 15, 2019

abhinavdahiya commented Jan 15, 2019

openshift-ci-robot commented Jan 15, 2019

wking commented Jan 15, 2019

wking commented Jan 15, 2019

openshift-bot commented Jan 15, 2019

wking commented Jan 15, 2019

wking commented Jan 15, 2019

wking commented Jan 15, 2019

wking commented Jan 16, 2019

wking commented Jan 16, 2019

wking commented Jan 16, 2019

wking commented Jan 16, 2019