Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

openstack: keepalived to pass cluster-config.yml to runtimecfg #1050

Conversation

mandre
Copy link
Member

@mandre mandre commented Aug 8, 2019

This pulls in fix
#1043 for
openstack.

A recent installer change started using a loopback address in
kubeconfig as the default on the bootstrap node. baremetal-runtimecfg
will begin using cluster-config.yml if it exists first, in order to get
the domain and name of the cluster.

This patch adds a flag for this to the keepalived bootstrap pod in
order to utilize it. This should only affect the bootstrap pods.

- What I did

- How to verify it

- Description for the changelog

This pulls in fix
openshift#1043 for
openstack.

A recent installer change started using a loopback address in
kubeconfig as the default on the bootstrap node. baremetal-runtimecfg
will begin using cluster-config.yml if it exists first, in order to get
the domain and name of the cluster.

This patch adds a flag for this to the keepalived bootstrap pod in
order to utilize it. This should only affect the bootstrap pods.
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Aug 8, 2019
@tomassedovic
Copy link
Contributor

/assign

@tomassedovic
Copy link
Contributor

/label platform/openstack

@tomassedovic
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm
/approve

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 8, 2019
@tomassedovic
Copy link
Contributor

/test e2e-openstack

@tomassedovic
Copy link
Contributor

/assign @kikisdeliveryservice

Please take a look, this mirrors a change already merged for baremetal and it fixes a deployment & CI issue we're seeing with OpenStack.

@mandre
Copy link
Member Author

mandre commented Aug 8, 2019

Hi @kikisdeliveryservice, this PR unblocks openshift/installer#1959, meaning we likely won't need #1040 and can simply revert 759702e as was the original plan.

@runcom
Copy link
Member

runcom commented Aug 8, 2019

/approve
/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: mandre, runcom, tomassedovic

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 8, 2019
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit fbd858c into openshift:master Aug 8, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants