-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 461
OCPBUGS-65731: Skip Azure Confidential Compute Clusters for boot image updates #5432
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
@djoshy: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-65731, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request. |
|
Verification:
The message is misleading in case of using a controlplanemachineset: It points to a machineset, but we are configuring a controlplanemachineset. It says it is not supported for Azure too, first time I read it I understood that SecurityType TrustedLaunch is not supported, but actually what's not supported is to updated the boot image when SecurityType TrustedLaunch is configured. |
Thanks for verifying @sergiordlr ! I've tweaked the message to be more clear, let me know if that is better. |
|
/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-machine-config-operator-release-4.21-periodics-e2e-azure-mco-disruptive /label acknowledge-critical-fixes-only This will require to be backported to 4.21 if it misses branch, and since this is opt-in behavior for 4.21, it should be a safe change. |
|
@djoshy: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command
See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/965e5ee0-d473-11f0-844c-7c1d750fd85d-0 |
yuqi-zhang
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
/acknowledge-critical-fixes-only
Should be a safe merge regardless, since confidential vms are in techpreview, we shouldn't break anything at this time.
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: djoshy, yuqi-zhang The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
/retest-required |
|
@djoshy: The following test failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
The new message when we configure the update boot image functionality in a machineset in an azure confidential cluster is:
When we enable techpreview we can see that the machinecontrolmachinesets are skipped too with a similar message: Machinesets are ControlplaneMachinesets were not updated, and the message is clear enough. Thank you very much!! /label qe-approved |
|
@djoshy: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-65731, which is valid. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
@sergiordlr: This PR has been marked as verified by In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
2abecff
into
openshift:main
|
@djoshy: Jira Issue Verification Checks: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-65731 Jira Issue OCPBUGS-65731 has been moved to the MODIFIED state and will move to the VERIFIED state when the change is available in an accepted nightly payload. 🕓 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
No new e2e extended test cases will be created. We consider that test cases in this PR will cover this scenario. |
- What I did
Added an exemption for Azure
MachineSetswith a non-emptysecurityTypefield set. See attached bug for additional context.- How to verify it
I've added a few units for this, but unsure how to launch a confidential compute cluster. The boot image controller should skip over the
machinesetsin those cases - the controller logs andmachinesetsthemselves could be examined to verify this behavior.