-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 243
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Move Operator Hub out of experimental mode #3938
Move Operator Hub out of experimental mode #3938
Conversation
Code looks great. I did review this code twice already before the rebasing mess! So big approval from me. /approve |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: cdrage The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
The three test specs that failed are in the file
And they all failed with the same error: But on my local setup running CRC with OpenShift 4.5, doing |
Unrelated error in 4.5 integration tests
/test v4.5-integration-e2e |
The issue was due to #3943 which got fixed now. Maybe you need to rebase the pr to get the test passed. |
/test v4.5-integration-e2e |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #3938 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 44.83% 44.55% -0.29%
==========================================
Files 143 143
Lines 13908 13985 +77
==========================================
- Hits 6236 6231 -5
- Misses 7082 7163 +81
- Partials 590 591 +1
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
/lgtm |
@@ -96,6 +98,7 @@ type LinkOptions struct { | |||
func NewLinkOptions() *LinkOptions { | |||
options := LinkOptions{} | |||
options.commonLinkOptions = newCommonLinkOptions() | |||
options.commonLinkOptions.csvSupport, _ = util.IsCSVSupported() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Obviously late on this but this should actually be done in Complete… New functions should contain as little logic as possible unless it cannot be avoided.
What type of PR is this?
/kind feature
/kind code-refactoring
What does does this PR do / why we need it:
It moves Operator Hub integration out of experimental mode. We need it for v2.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #3595
PR acceptance criteria:
Unit test
Integration test
Documentation
I have read the test guidelines
How to test changes / Special notes to the reviewer: