Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Sync olm 12-10-21 #223

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Dec 12, 2021
Merged

Conversation

anik120
Copy link
Contributor

@anik120 anik120 commented Dec 9, 2021

Note: operator-framework/operator-lifecycle-manager#2216 it yet to make it in this repo due to a failing e2e test. (refer: bz)

This upstream commit being introduced in this PR touches a part of the code that was introduced in the above mentioned PR. The commit's been amended to keep all other changes in it, with the exception of the change in the code that's missing in this repo.

@anik120 anik120 changed the title Sync olm 12 10 21 Sync olm 12-10-21 Dec 9, 2021
@kevinrizza
Copy link
Member

/approve

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Dec 9, 2021
* Rename CI github workflows

Update the various CI workflows names that are run on a per-PR basis to
help distinguish between individual action runs when interacting with
the github UI.

Signed-off-by: timflannagan <timflannagan@gmail.com>

* .github/workflows: Rename the actions that run OLM on kind/minikube and remove any 'e2e' references

Signed-off-by: timflannagan <timflannagan@gmail.com>

Upstream-repository: operator-lifecycle-manager
Upstream-commit: d92ef2c06fe3cec1631c15b8877b5b60d3cbd57d
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 9, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: anik120, kevinrizza

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@anik120
Copy link
Contributor Author

anik120 commented Dec 9, 2021

/retest

timflannagan and others added 7 commits December 10, 2021 00:18
Update various pkg,test packages are removed any obvious duplicate
package imports that violate local static linters.

Signed-off-by: timflannagan <timflannagan@gmail.com>

Upstream-repository: operator-lifecycle-manager
Upstream-commit: 40b8b7104e3ce577c1c0f0f08e6854d62978169c
…les (#2460)

Update the test/e2e/collect-ci-artifacts.sh bash script and extend the
list of resources gathered to also create a snapshot of CatalogSource
resources in the test namespace.

Signed-off-by: timflannagan <timflannagan@gmail.com>

Upstream-repository: operator-lifecycle-manager
Upstream-commit: ea007623445b949ca69667a3c4d52c104595bce0
Signed-off-by: akihikokuroda <akihikokuroda2020@gmail.com>

Upstream-repository: operator-lifecycle-manager
Upstream-commit: e064f3bf6b491b5517fea6fdeba30700e9b4687d
… supplied (#2462)

Update the cmd/[catalog,olm] main packages and silence any vet warnings
about logrus.Fatal usage that supply formatting directives:

```bash
$ go vet ./cmd/...
cmd/catalog/main.go:114:3: Fatal call has possible formatting directive %v
cmd/olm/main.go:123:3: Fatal call has possible formatting directive %v
```

Signed-off-by: timflannagan <timflannagan@gmail.com>

Upstream-repository: operator-lifecycle-manager
Upstream-commit: 3949ceb4dc8cb5668c621904a402de4186f4ea26
Update the CI-related workflows and avoid specifying the paths-ignore
keyword. Because we have configure required status contexts through
branch protection rules, any workflow that is skipped due to path
filtering results in an unknown status, which results in tide stalling
any merge despite a PR matching the merge criteria (e.g. lgtm/approval
label present).

This is a short term fix to the solution: the long term
solution is dynamically filtering out certain file paths as a
pre-requisite job vs. statically filtering using the paths-ignore
filter, while we wait for GitHub to add this as first-class functionality.

Signed-off-by: timflannagan <timflannagan@gmail.com>

Upstream-repository: operator-lifecycle-manager
Upstream-commit: 285a53507f85ce3509c9dbeb8beeea0482cdf4b6
Signed-off-by: Frederic Giloux <fgiloux@redhat.com>

Upstream-repository: operator-lifecycle-manager
Upstream-commit: 53c7d3f3b13e3704cd2d4a7995c7df9c4b7a9dfe
This commit introduces the MAINTAINERS.md file in an effort
to decouple project maintainer status from approval and lgtm
permissions relied on by the project automated continuous
integration tooling.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Greene <greene.al1991@gmail.com>

Upstream-repository: operator-lifecycle-manager
Upstream-commit: 4f5c16c71fecdfdb02e313cb3173a936261233d5
@anik120
Copy link
Contributor Author

anik120 commented Dec 10, 2021

/retest

3 similar comments
@anik120
Copy link
Contributor Author

anik120 commented Dec 10, 2021

/retest

@anik120
Copy link
Contributor Author

anik120 commented Dec 10, 2021

/retest

@anik120
Copy link
Contributor Author

anik120 commented Dec 10, 2021

/retest

@njhale
Copy link
Contributor

njhale commented Dec 10, 2021

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 10, 2021
@timflannagan
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

1 similar comment
@awgreene
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

5 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

20 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 12, 2021

@anik120: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit ff03d62 into openshift:master Dec 12, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants