Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

UPSTREAM: 47347: actually check for a live discovery endpoint before … #14881

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 30, 2017

Conversation

deads2k
Copy link
Contributor

@deads2k deads2k commented Jun 26, 2017

…aggregating (part 2)

Fixes #14842

It seems that using a timeout on a request doesn't make the request call return (weird), but it does kick the context.Done() and give a valid error message back. https://godoc.org/golang.org/x/net/context#Context

[test]

@mfojtik
Copy link
Contributor

mfojtik commented Jun 28, 2017

LGTM

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Evaluated for origin merge up to f7a3fed

@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor Author

deads2k commented Jun 28, 2017

too much has merged for a manual merge.

re[test]

@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor Author

deads2k commented Jun 28, 2017

re[test]

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

continuous-integration/openshift-jenkins/merge Running (https://ci.openshift.redhat.com/jenkins/job/merge_pull_request_origin/1164/) (Base Commit: 1a96817) (PR Branch Commit: f7a3fed)

@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor

Hrm, this looks like it's failing on GCE

@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor Author

deads2k commented Jun 28, 2017

Hrm, this looks like it's failing on GCE

My kingdom for a log. How can I see the master logs?

@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor

will try to recreate and get them for you

@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor


etwork default (network: "172.16.0.0/16", hostSubnetBits: 9, serviceNetwork: "172.30.0.0/16", pluginName: "redhat/openshift-ovs-subnet")
ge Collector: All resource monitors have synced. Proceeding to collect garbage
oleBinding): 1 objects queued in incoming channel.
lusterRoleBinding): 1 objects queued in incoming channel.
lusterRole): 1 objects queued in incoming channel.
lusterRoleBinding): 2 objects queued in incoming channel.
penshift/origin/pkg/sdn/plugin/common.go:181: Failed to watch *network.HostSubnet: unknown (get hostsubnets)
lusterRole): 2 objects queued in incoming channel.
penshift/origin/pkg/sdn/plugin/common.go:181: Failed to watch *network.HostSubnet: unknown (get hostsubnets)
penshift/origin/pkg/sdn/plugin/common.go:181: Failed to watch *network.HostSubnet: unknown (get hostsubnets)
penshift/origin/pkg/sdn/plugin/common.go:181: Failed to watch *network.HostSubnet: unknown (get hostsubnets)
penshift/origin/pkg/sdn/plugin/common.go:181: Failed to watch *network.HostSubnet: unknown (get hostsubnets)
penshift/origin/pkg/sdn/plugin/common.go:181: Failed to watch *network.HostSubnet: unknown (get hostsubnets)
penshift/origin/pkg/sdn/plugin/common.go:181: Failed to watch *network.HostSubnet: unknown (get hostsubnets)
penshift/origin/pkg/sdn/plugin/common.go:181: Failed to watch *network.HostSubnet: unknown (get hostsubnets)

@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor

Haven't seen those errors on any other PR

@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor

That's from the same RPMs you used against ansible master - the only failure i can see. Was consistent after restart. Not happening in origin master.

@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor Author

deads2k commented Jun 29, 2017

That's from the same RPMs you used against ansible master - the only failure i can see. Was consistent after restart. Not happening in origin master.

Thanks.

@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor

smarterclayton commented Jun 29, 2017 via email

@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor Author

deads2k commented Jun 29, 2017

That looks shockingly similar to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1465361 . I wonder why I can't get that locally.

@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor Author

deads2k commented Jun 29, 2017

re[test]. I really can't see how this change (to non-local apiservices) can cause a failure in a local APIservice.

@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor

Flake #14881

@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor

[test]

@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor

Yeah, I'm not sure this is your problem, the linked bug definitely is happening regardless. If I get another green I'll merge.

@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor Author

deads2k commented Jun 30, 2017

hit the new-app problem this time. https://ci.openshift.redhat.com/jenkins/job/test_pull_request_origin/2828/

re[test]

@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor

smarterclayton commented Jun 30, 2017 via email

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Evaluated for origin test up to f7a3fed

@deads2k deads2k added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 30, 2017
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

continuous-integration/openshift-jenkins/test SUCCESS (https://ci.openshift.redhat.com/jenkins/job/test_pull_request_origin/2868/) (Base Commit: 025772c) (PR Branch Commit: f7a3fed)

@deads2k deads2k deleted the agg-09-check branch August 3, 2017 19:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants