Skip to content

Comments

NO-JIRA:fixing CNV's must-gather image ci failure#30784

Merged
openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 1 commit intoopenshift:mainfrom
gangwgr:fix-ci
Feb 17, 2026
Merged

NO-JIRA:fixing CNV's must-gather image ci failure#30784
openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 1 commit intoopenshift:mainfrom
gangwgr:fix-ci

Conversation

@gangwgr
Copy link
Contributor

@gangwgr gangwgr commented Feb 13, 2026

NO-JIRA:fixing CNV's must-gather image ci failure

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

Pipeline controller notification
This repo is configured to use the pipeline controller. Second-stage tests will be triggered either automatically or after lgtm label is added, depending on the repository configuration. The pipeline controller will automatically detect which contexts are required and will utilize /test Prow commands to trigger the second stage.

For optional jobs, comment /test ? to see a list of all defined jobs. To trigger manually all jobs from second stage use /pipeline required command.

This repository is configured in: automatic mode

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Feb 13, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@gangwgr: This pull request explicitly references no jira issue.

Details

In response to this:

NO-JIRA:fixing CNV's must-gather image ci failure

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@elfosardo
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 13, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

Scheduling required tests:
/test e2e-aws-csi
/test e2e-aws-ovn-fips
/test e2e-aws-ovn-microshift
/test e2e-aws-ovn-microshift-serial
/test e2e-aws-ovn-serial-1of2
/test e2e-aws-ovn-serial-2of2
/test e2e-gcp-csi
/test e2e-gcp-ovn
/test e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade
/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6
/test e2e-vsphere-ovn
/test e2e-vsphere-ovn-upi

@gangwgr
Copy link
Contributor Author

gangwgr commented Feb 13, 2026

/test e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade

@gangwgr
Copy link
Contributor Author

gangwgr commented Feb 16, 2026

/payload 4.22 nightly blocking

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 16, 2026

@gangwgr: trigger 14 job(s) of type blocking for the nightly release of OCP 4.22

  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-main-ci-4.22-e2e-aws-upgrade-ovn-single-node
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-main-nightly-4.22-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade-fips
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-main-ci-4.22-e2e-azure-ovn-upgrade
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-main-ci-4.22-upgrade-from-stable-4.21-e2e-gcp-ovn-rt-upgrade
  • periodic-ci-openshift-hypershift-release-4.22-periodics-e2e-aws-ovn-conformance
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-main-nightly-4.22-e2e-aws-ovn-serial-1of2
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-main-nightly-4.22-e2e-aws-ovn-serial-2of2
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-main-ci-4.22-e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-main-ci-4.22-e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview-serial-1of3
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-main-ci-4.22-e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview-serial-2of3
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-main-ci-4.22-e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview-serial-3of3
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-main-nightly-4.22-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade-fips-no-nat-instance
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-main-nightly-4.22-e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv4
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-main-nightly-4.22-e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/bbbd2500-0af0-11f1-9311-5efe94bdc812-0

@gangwgr
Copy link
Contributor Author

gangwgr commented Feb 16, 2026

/assign @elfosardo

@elfosardo
Copy link
Contributor

@gangwgr I've already added lgtm here, we need someone to approve and to verify it

@neisw
Copy link
Contributor

neisw commented Feb 17, 2026

/approve
/verified by ci
/label acknowledge-critical-fixes-only,

@neisw
Copy link
Contributor

neisw commented Feb 17, 2026

/label acknowledge-critical-fixes-only

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria label Feb 17, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@neisw: This PR has been marked as verified by ci.

Details

In response to this:

/approve
/verified by ci
/label acknowledge-critical-fixes-only,

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 17, 2026

@neisw: The label(s) /label acknowledge-critical-fixes-only, cannot be applied. These labels are supported: acknowledge-critical-fixes-only, platform/aws, platform/azure, platform/baremetal, platform/google, platform/libvirt, platform/openstack, ga, tide/merge-method-merge, tide/merge-method-rebase, tide/merge-method-squash, px-approved, docs-approved, qe-approved, ux-approved, no-qe, downstream-change-needed, rebase/manual, cluster-config-api-changed, run-integration-tests, approved, backport-risk-assessed, bugzilla/valid-bug, cherry-pick-approved, jira/valid-bug, ok-to-test, stability-fix-approved, staff-eng-approved. Is this label configured under labels -> additional_labels or labels -> restricted_labels in plugin.yaml?

Details

In response to this:

/approve
/verified by ci
/label acknowledge-critical-fixes-only,

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the acknowledge-critical-fixes-only Indicates if the issuer of the label is OK with the policy. label Feb 17, 2026
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 17, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: elfosardo, gangwgr, neisw

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 17, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

Scheduling required tests:
/test e2e-aws-csi
/test e2e-aws-ovn-fips
/test e2e-aws-ovn-microshift
/test e2e-aws-ovn-microshift-serial
/test e2e-aws-ovn-serial-1of2
/test e2e-aws-ovn-serial-2of2
/test e2e-gcp-csi
/test e2e-gcp-ovn
/test e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade
/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6
/test e2e-vsphere-ovn
/test e2e-vsphere-ovn-upi

@gangwgr
Copy link
Contributor Author

gangwgr commented Feb 17, 2026

/test e2e-gcp-csi

1 similar comment
@gangwgr
Copy link
Contributor Author

gangwgr commented Feb 17, 2026

/test e2e-gcp-csi

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 17, 2026

@gangwgr: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit a97874f into openshift:main Feb 17, 2026
20 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

acknowledge-critical-fixes-only Indicates if the issuer of the label is OK with the policy. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants