4.13 9.2 #1210

cgwalters · 2023-03-21T14:12:30Z

This is a manual backport of #1204
(Because that one got entangled with the 4.14 branching)

manifest/9.2: Ensure package come from RHEL by default

Make sure that we use RHEL (and not RHAOS) packages by default.

(cherry picked from commit 49f9824)

overlay: Remove unused 25rhcos-azure-udev-rules

Not needed (and not actually used right now) in RHEL 8.6+ anymore.

(cherry picked from commit 5d5d0c5)

denylist: Skip ext.config.shared.ignition.resource.remote

See #1190

(cherry picked from commit d47155a)

s390x/kola-denylist: Re-enable working tests

fips.enable* is working on newest s390x. Remove the test from denylist.
For more details see #546

coreos.ignition.mount.* is fixed with gdisk-1.0.3-9.el8. Remove the test from
denylist.

ext.config.shared.ignition.stable-boot is fixed in RHEL 9. Only disable for
RHEL 8 builds.

Signed-off-by: Jan Schintag jan.schintag@de.ibm.com
(cherry picked from commit 36729d1)

gitmodules: track rhcos-4.13 branch

Start tracing the rhcos-4.13 branch of fedora-coreos-config as a
part of branching for 4.13.

bump f-c-c submodule to track rhcos-4.13 branch

git shortlog --no-merges d170f19..f00040e1616ef244dfe622cad50b876d8087039e

Adam Piasecki (1):
      tests/kola/selinux/enforcing: Enhance SELinux mode test

Adam0Brien (1):
      F38 Changes: Kola test for shorter shutdown timer

CoreOS Bot (6):
      lockfiles: bump to latest
      lockfiles: bump to latest
      lockfiles: drop graduated overrides 🎓
      Sync repo templates ⚙
      lockfiles: bump to latest
      lockfiles: bump to latest

Dusty Mabe (4):
      tests/kola: add version comparison functions to commonlib.sh
      tests/kola: mark systemd.default-unit-timeouts as platform-independent
      tests/kola: break up long line in systemd.default-unit-timeouts
      denylist: bump snooze for files.file-directory-permissions

Huijing Hei (1):
      transposefs: add new workaround using try in loop

Jonathan Lebon (1):
      ci: update for new kolaTestIso()

gursewak1997 (2):
      Move chrony config from generator to systemd service
      platform-chrony: Make /run/coreos dir so we can create platform-chrony.conf

denylist: All ignition.resource.remote

Maintaining this test just requires way too much intricate
stuff to be chained together.

Merge pull request #1198 from travier/4.13-backports

[4.13] Backports from 4.14

Revert "manifest/9.2: Ensure package come from RHEL by default"

We already have to use coreos-installer from the RHAOS repo and it's
likely that we will have to do it again in the future for 4.14.

Remove this to avoid having to make a PR for each package.

This reverts commit 49f9824.

(cherry picked from commit e346f8a)

manifest/9.2: Keep legacy coreos/toolbox

Unfortuantely, we're not yet ready to move to the new containers/toolbox
workflow. We'll attempt that for a future release.

See: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-8009
Partially reverts: 65776fa

(cherry picked from commit 3eb4abb)

manifests: Merge common-el9.yaml into common.yaml

(cherry picked from commit aa7f640)

manifests/9.2: Use RHEL 9.2 repos

(cherry picked from commit 54daebb)

manifest/c9s: Disable all repos by default

(cherry picked from commit ab22dee)

manifests: Remove RHEL 8 manifests

(cherry picked from commit be10693)

manifests: Remove RHEL 9.0 manifests

(cherry picked from commit 27cd97c)

manifest: Back to rhel toolbox

Since we don't have a legacy toolbox build in OCP channels yet.

(cherry picked from commit cdeb252)

rhel-9.2: Fix two more references to 9.0

With this things build for me.

(cherry picked from commit fa8eef4)

More 90 -> 92 adjustments

(cherry picked from commit ee85017)

We already have to use coreos-installer from the RHAOS repo and it's likely that we will have to do it again in the future for 4.14. Remove this to avoid having to make a PR for each package. This reverts commit 49f9824. (cherry picked from commit e346f8a)

Unfortuantely, we're not yet ready to move to the new containers/toolbox workflow. We'll attempt that for a future release. See: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-8009 Partially reverts: openshift@65776fa (cherry picked from commit 3eb4abb)

(cherry picked from commit aa7f640)

(cherry picked from commit 54daebb)

(cherry picked from commit ab22dee)

(cherry picked from commit be10693)

(cherry picked from commit 27cd97c)

Since we don't have a legacy toolbox build in OCP channels yet. (cherry picked from commit cdeb252)

With this things build for me. (cherry picked from commit fa8eef4)

(cherry picked from commit ee85017)

openshift-ci · 2023-03-21T14:12:33Z

@cgwalters: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

4.13 9.2

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

(cherry picked from commit a5eb84a)

cgwalters · 2023-03-21T14:44:56Z

OK lifting draft, I've tested this in a local build so far as cosa build; cosa build-extensions-container, also:

[root@cosa-devsh ~]# rpm -qa --queryformat='%{VENDOR}\n' | sort -u
Red Hat, Inc.

cgwalters · 2023-03-21T14:45:18Z

/override ci/prow/rhcos-92-build-test-metal
/override ci/prow/rhcos-92-build-test-qemu

openshift-ci · 2023-03-21T14:54:22Z

@cgwalters: Overrode contexts on behalf of cgwalters: ci/prow/rhcos-92-build-test-metal, ci/prow/rhcos-92-build-test-qemu

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/rhcos-92-build-test-metal
/override ci/prow/rhcos-92-build-test-qemu

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

cgwalters · 2023-03-21T17:28:41Z

Argh. FTR I accidentally force-pushed this branch to Timothée's original branch for the 4.14 PR over at #1204
I don't think this matters now that it's merged, but just for historical reference.

cgwalters · 2023-03-21T17:52:57Z

/test ci/prow/scos-9-build-test-metal

openshift-ci · 2023-03-21T17:53:05Z

@cgwalters: The specified target(s) for /test were not found.
The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:

/test images
/test rhcos-92-build-test-metal
/test rhcos-92-build-test-qemu
/test scos-9-build-test-metal
/test scos-9-build-test-qemu
/test validate

Use /test all to run all jobs.

In response to this:

/test ci/prow/scos-9-build-test-metal

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

cgwalters · 2023-03-21T17:53:17Z

/override ci/prow/rhcos-92-build-test-metal
/override ci/prow/rhcos-92-build-test-qemu
/test scos-9-build-test-metal

openshift-ci · 2023-03-21T17:53:51Z

@cgwalters: Overrode contexts on behalf of cgwalters: ci/prow/rhcos-92-build-test-metal, ci/prow/rhcos-92-build-test-qemu

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/rhcos-92-build-test-metal
/override ci/prow/rhcos-92-build-test-qemu
/test scos-9-build-test-metal

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

jmarrero · 2023-03-21T18:06:48Z

/lgtm

cgwalters · 2023-03-21T18:07:04Z

I was sanity checking this by doing

$ git diff origin/master..
diff --git a/.gitmodules b/.gitmodules
index 4af41576..7fbb1b7e 100644
--- a/.gitmodules
+++ b/.gitmodules
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
 [submodule "fedora-coreos-config"]
 	path = fedora-coreos-config
 	url = https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-config
-	branch = testing-devel
+	branch = rhcos-4.13
diff --git a/ci/prow-entrypoint.sh b/ci/prow-entrypoint.sh
index 22e19283..ced382e6 100755
--- a/ci/prow-entrypoint.sh
+++ b/ci/prow-entrypoint.sh
@@ -73,9 +73,9 @@ prepare_repos() {
     # Figure out which version we're building
     rhelver=$(rpm-ostree compose tree --print-only "${manifest}" | jq -r '.["automatic-version-prefix"]' | cut -f2 -d.)
 
-    # Temporary workaround until we publish builds in the default path
-    if [[ "${rhelver}" == "92" ]]; then
-        prev_build_url="${REDIRECTOR_URL}/rhcos-${ocpver}-9.2/"
+    # Temporary workaround until we publish builds for other versions
+    if [[ "${rhelver}" == "86" ]]; then
+        prev_build_url="${REDIRECTOR_URL}/rhcos-${ocpver}/"
         # Fetch the previous build
         cosa buildfetch --url="${prev_build_url}"
     fi
@@ -84,16 +84,15 @@ prepare_repos() {
     case "${rhelver}" in
         92)
             curl --fail -L "http://base-${ocpver_mut}-rhel${rhelver}.ocp.svc.cluster.local" -o "src/config/ocp.repo"
-            # Work around podman not being built in 4.14
-            curl --fail -L "http://base-4-13-rhel${rhelver}.ocp.svc.cluster.local" -o "src/config/ocp-prev.repo"
-            cat src/config/ocp{,-prev}.repo
+            cat src/config/ocp.repo
             ;;
         *)
             # Assume C9S/SCOS if the version does not match known values for RHEL
             # Temporary workaround until we have all packages for SCOS
             curl --fail -L "http://base-${ocpver_mut}-rhel92.ocp.svc.cluster.local" -o "src/config/tmp.repo"
-            awk '/rhel-9.2-server-ose-4.14/,/^$/' "src/config/tmp.repo" > "src/config/ocp90.repo"
-            cat src/config/ocp90.repo
+            cat src/config/tmp.repo
+            awk '/rhel-9.2-server-ose-4.13/,/^$/' "src/config/tmp.repo" > "src/config/ocp.repo"
+            cat src/config/ocp.repo
             rm "src/config/tmp.repo"
             ;;
     esac
@@ -243,15 +242,27 @@ main () {
             prepare_repos
             ;;
         "build" | "init-and-build-default")  # TODO: change prow job to use init-and-build-default
-            cosa_init "rhel-coreos-9"
+            cosa_init "rhel-coreos-8"
             cosa_build
             ;;
         "rhcos-cosa-prow-pr-ci")
             setup_user
-            cosa_init "rhel-coreos-9"
+            cosa_init "rhel-coreos-8"
+            cosa_build
+            kola_test_qemu
+            ;;
+        "rhcos-86-build-test-qemu")
+            setup_user
+            cosa_init "rhel-coreos-8"
             cosa_build
             kola_test_qemu
             ;;
+        "rhcos-86-build-test-metal")
+            setup_user
+            cosa_init "rhel-coreos-8"
+            cosa_build
+            kola_test_metal
+            ;;
         "rhcos-92-build-test-qemu"|"rhcos-90-build-test-qemu")
             setup_user
             cosa_init "rhel-coreos-9"
@@ -270,16 +281,12 @@ main () {
             cosa_build
             kola_test_qemu
             ;;
-        "scos-9-build-test-metal")
+        "scos-9-build-test-metal" )
             setup_user
             cosa_init "scos"
             cosa_build
             kola_test_metal
             ;;
-        "rhcos-86-build-test-qemu"|"rhcos-86-build-test-metal")
-            # Disabled tests
-            exit 0
-            ;;
         *)
             # This case ensures that we exhaustively list the tests that should
             # pass for a PR. To add a new test in openshift/os:
diff --git a/docs/faq.md b/docs/faq.md
index 2aa848dc..d5ea0380 100644
--- a/docs/faq.md
+++ b/docs/faq.md
@@ -89,15 +89,6 @@ $ rpm-ostree rebase --experimental ostree-unverified-registry:quay.io/openshift-
 
 This is particularly relevant because it's common for OCP/RHCOS to not publish new "bootimages" or disk images unless needed.
 
-### Outside of release image pull specs
-
-At the current time, these floating tags are available:
-
- - quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-v4.0-art-dev:4.13-9.2
- - quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-v4.0-art-dev:4.12
-
-This may change in the future.
-
 ## Q: How do I see which RHEL and RHCOS version is in a release?
 
 Like above, but add `oc image info`:
diff --git a/fedora-coreos-config b/fedora-coreos-config
index e0b38afe..f00040e1 160000
--- a/fedora-coreos-config
+++ b/fedora-coreos-config
@@ -1 +1 @@
-Subproject commit e0b38afe041f77c9ebc4f7d586b00987e8d280f2
+Subproject commit f00040e1616ef244dfe622cad50b876d8087039e
diff --git a/kola-denylist.yaml b/kola-denylist.yaml
index a7f3535c..e6296849 100644
--- a/kola-denylist.yaml
+++ b/kola-denylist.yaml
@@ -3,6 +3,14 @@
 # see: https://github.com/coreos/coreos-assembler/pull/866.
 - pattern: skip-console-warnings
   tracker: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2164765
+- pattern: coreos.ignition.journald-log
+  tracker: https://github.com/coreos/coreos-assembler/issues/1173
+- pattern: ext.config.shared.ignition.stable-boot
+  tracker: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2075085
+  osversion:
+   - rhel-8.6
+  arches:
+  - s390x
 - pattern: ext.config.shared.kdump.crash
   tracker: https://github.com/coreos/coreos-assembler/issues/2725
   arches:
@@ -23,6 +31,12 @@
   tracker: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2080063
   arches:
     - s390x
+- pattern: luks.*
+  tracker: https://github.com/openshift/os/issues/1149
+  arches:
+   - ppc64le
+   - aarch64
+   - s390x
 
 # We're using some COPR stuff intentionally
 - pattern: ext.config.shared.content-origins
@@ -32,8 +46,17 @@
 - pattern: ext.config.version.rhel-matches-rhcos-build
   tracker: ''
 
+# Temporary to unblock COSA CI
+- pattern: ext.config.shared.clhm.network-device-info
+  tracker: https://github.com/openshift/os/issues/1041
+  osversion:
+   - rhel-8.6
+
 - pattern: ext.config.rpm-ostree.replace-rt-kernel
   tracker: https://github.com/openshift/os/issues/1099
 
 - pattern: rhcos.network.*
   tracker: https://github.com/coreos/coreos-assembler/issues/3376
+
+- pattern: ext.config.shared.ignition.resource.remote
+  tracker: https://github.com/openshift/os/issues/1190
diff --git a/manifest-c9s.yaml b/manifest-c9s.yaml
index 5a096ebe..9ec89967 100644
--- a/manifest-c9s.yaml
+++ b/manifest-c9s.yaml
@@ -26,14 +26,14 @@ repos:
   - okd-copr
   - podman-next-copr
   # Include RHCOS 9 repo for oc, hyperkube and conmon-rs
-  - rhel-9.2-server-ose-4.14
+  - rhel-9.2-server-ose-4.13
 
 # We include hours/minutes to avoid version number reuse
-automatic-version-prefix: "414.9.<date:%Y%m%d%H%M>"
+automatic-version-prefix: "413.9.<date:%Y%m%d%H%M>"
 # This ensures we're semver-compatible which OpenShift wants
 automatic-version-suffix: "-"
 # Keep this is sync with the version in postprocess
-mutate-os-release: "4.14"
+mutate-os-release: "4.13"
 
 postprocess:
   - |
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ postprocess:
 
      # Tweak /usr/lib/os-release
      grep -v "OSTREE_VERSION" /etc/os-release > /usr/lib/os-release.stream
-     OCP_RELEASE="4.14"
+     OCP_RELEASE="4.13"
      (
      . /etc/os-release
      cat > /usr/lib/os-release <<EOF
diff --git a/manifest-rhel-9.2.yaml b/manifest-rhel-9.2.yaml
index 612e26f1..babaaa56 100644
--- a/manifest-rhel-9.2.yaml
+++ b/manifest-rhel-9.2.yaml
@@ -20,15 +20,14 @@ repos:
   - rhel-9.2-baseos
   - rhel-9.2-appstream
   - rhel-9.2-fast-datapath
-  - rhel-9.2-server-ose-4.13  # FIXME a few things are built only in 4.13 right now, like podman
-  - rhel-9.2-server-ose-4.14
+  - rhel-9.2-server-ose-4.13
 
 # We include hours/minutes to avoid version number reuse
-automatic-version-prefix: "414.92.<date:%Y%m%d%H%M>"
+automatic-version-prefix: "413.92.<date:%Y%m%d%H%M>"
 # This ensures we're semver-compatible which OpenShift wants
 automatic-version-suffix: "-"
 # Keep this is sync with the version in postprocess
-mutate-os-release: "4.14"
+mutate-os-release: "4.13"
 
 postprocess:
   - |
@@ -37,7 +36,7 @@ postprocess:
 
      # Tweak /usr/lib/os-release
      grep -v "OSTREE_VERSION" /etc/os-release > /usr/lib/os-release.rhel
-     OCP_RELEASE="4.14"
+     OCP_RELEASE="4.13"
      (
      . /etc/os-release
      cat > /usr/lib/os-release <<EOF
@@ -121,7 +120,7 @@ repo-packages:
     packages:
       # We want the one shipping in RHEL, not the equivalently versioned one in RHAOS
       - nss-altfiles
-  - repo: rhel-9.2-server-ose-4.14
+  - repo: rhel-9.2-server-ose-4.13
     packages:
       - conmon-rs
       - cri-o

Which generally looks sane to me.

jmarrero · 2023-03-21T18:10:58Z

I don't see anything scary in the PR. A lot of removing of the old manifest and consolidating into a 9/9.2 manifests and a few scripts. Changes look sane to me, but tests gonna be the ultimate judge.

openshift-ci · 2023-03-21T18:11:55Z

@cgwalters: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

4.13 9.2

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

cgwalters · 2023-03-21T18:30:01Z

OK, I logged into the pods and verified that scos9 is building, the kola tests are running. I'm not totally sure about waiting the whole cycle for all of those.

ravanelli

/lgtm

openshift-ci · 2023-03-21T18:45:22Z

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: cgwalters, jmarrero, ravanelli

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

~~OWNERS~~ [cgwalters,jmarrero,ravanelli]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

openshift-ci · 2023-03-21T19:26:13Z

@cgwalters: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name	Commit	Details	Required	Rerun command
ci/prow/rhcos-92-build-test-qemu	`30b7a9d`	link	true	`/test rhcos-92-build-test-qemu`
ci/prow/rhcos-92-build-test-metal	`30b7a9d`	link	true	`/test rhcos-92-build-test-metal`

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

cgwalters · 2023-03-21T19:34:21Z

Ah, now looks like we're hitting tide ratelimiting.

dustymabe

Everything in here is cherry-picks ✔️ except for the last commit:

c9s: Use 9.2 OCP

Would be nice to have more context in that commit message. Otherwise LGTM.

/lgtm

cgwalters · 2023-03-21T19:43:40Z

Thanks for double checking! Agree on the last commit, I basically ran out of steam in understanding the repo setups here (particularly prow-entrypoint.sh and its interactions with the mirrors in release controller etc.)

travier and others added 10 commits March 21, 2023 09:49

manifests: Merge common-el9.yaml into common.yaml

5109f7e

(cherry picked from commit aa7f640)

manifests/9.2: Use RHEL 9.2 repos

f23c382

(cherry picked from commit 54daebb)

manifest/c9s: Disable all repos by default

4d328e3

(cherry picked from commit ab22dee)

manifests: Remove RHEL 8 manifests

6fbb7aa

(cherry picked from commit be10693)

manifests: Remove RHEL 9.0 manifests

79aae90

(cherry picked from commit 27cd97c)

manifest: Back to rhel toolbox

3c453e5

Since we don't have a legacy toolbox build in OCP channels yet. (cherry picked from commit cdeb252)

rhel-9.2: Fix two more references to 9.0

f6eac37

With this things build for me. (cherry picked from commit fa8eef4)

More 90 -> 92 adjustments

f9b8dda

(cherry picked from commit ee85017)

cgwalters marked this pull request as draft March 21, 2023 14:12

openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Mar 21, 2023

openshift-ci bot requested review from gursewak1997 and HuijingHei March 21, 2023 14:12

openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Mar 21, 2023

manifests: Use RHCOS 9 by default

06dafd4

(cherry picked from commit a5eb84a)

cgwalters marked this pull request as ready for review March 21, 2023 14:41

openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Mar 21, 2023

openshift-ci bot requested review from jschintag and sohankunkerkar March 21, 2023 14:50

cgwalters force-pushed the 4.13-9.2 branch from f856ea9 to 41a9e58 Compare March 21, 2023 16:48

c9s: Use 9.2 OCP

30b7a9d

cgwalters force-pushed the 4.13-9.2 branch from 41a9e58 to 30b7a9d Compare March 21, 2023 17:27

jmarrero approved these changes Mar 21, 2023

View reviewed changes

openshift-ci bot assigned jmarrero Mar 21, 2023

openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 21, 2023

ravanelli approved these changes Mar 21, 2023

View reviewed changes

openshift-ci bot assigned ravanelli Mar 21, 2023

cgwalters merged commit 8a2439a into openshift:release-4.13 Mar 21, 2023

dustymabe reviewed Mar 21, 2023

View reviewed changes

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

4.13 9.2 #1210

4.13 9.2 #1210

cgwalters commented Mar 21, 2023 •

edited

Loading

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 21, 2023

cgwalters commented Mar 21, 2023

cgwalters commented Mar 21, 2023

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 21, 2023

cgwalters commented Mar 21, 2023

cgwalters commented Mar 21, 2023

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 21, 2023

cgwalters commented Mar 21, 2023

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 21, 2023

jmarrero commented Mar 21, 2023

cgwalters commented Mar 21, 2023

jmarrero commented Mar 21, 2023

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 21, 2023

cgwalters commented Mar 21, 2023

ravanelli left a comment

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 21, 2023

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 21, 2023

cgwalters commented Mar 21, 2023

dustymabe left a comment

cgwalters commented Mar 21, 2023

4.13 9.2 #1210

4.13 9.2 #1210

Conversation

cgwalters commented Mar 21, 2023 • edited Loading

[4.13] Backports from 4.14

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 21, 2023

cgwalters commented Mar 21, 2023

cgwalters commented Mar 21, 2023

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 21, 2023

cgwalters commented Mar 21, 2023

cgwalters commented Mar 21, 2023

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 21, 2023

cgwalters commented Mar 21, 2023

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 21, 2023

jmarrero commented Mar 21, 2023

cgwalters commented Mar 21, 2023

jmarrero commented Mar 21, 2023

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 21, 2023

cgwalters commented Mar 21, 2023

ravanelli left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 21, 2023

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 21, 2023

cgwalters commented Mar 21, 2023

dustymabe left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

cgwalters commented Mar 21, 2023

cgwalters commented Mar 21, 2023 •

edited

Loading