Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add warning to network verification that HCPs are unsupported. #579

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 3, 2024

Conversation

RaphaelBut
Copy link
Contributor

Its not widely known, that network verifier is unable to run against HCPs.
This can lead to red herring situations and a warning is needed.

This is a follow up item from PMR 75 https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSD-23785

Its not widely know, that network verifier is unable to run against
HCPs.
This can lead to red herring situations and a warning is needed.
cmd/network/verification.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@@ -218,6 +219,12 @@ func (e *EgressVerification) setup(ctx context.Context) (*aws.Config, error) {
e.log.Debug(ctx, "cluster %s found from OCM: %s", e.ClusterId, cluster.ID())
e.cluster = cluster

if e.cluster.Hypershift().Enabled() {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Small conversation about this here: https://redhat-internal.slack.com/archives/CMD1L32M9/p1717424955110269

We may want to additionally

  1. Take that bash script and just make it a new osdctl command (for another PR, not here 😄 )
  2. Leave comments here explaining why HCPs aren't supported, and when we can remove this block of code

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good suggestions thanks! Will add the info from the thread.

@RaphaelBut
Copy link
Contributor Author

/label tide/merge-method-squash

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the tide/merge-method-squash Denotes a PR that should be squashed by tide when it merges. label Jun 3, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 3, 2024

@RaphaelBut: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Copy link
Contributor

@mjlshen mjlshen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/label tide/merge-method-squash
/approve

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 3, 2024
@AlexVulaj
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 3, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 3, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: AlexVulaj, mjlshen, RaphaelBut

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit d58ed21 into openshift:master Jun 3, 2024
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. tide/merge-method-squash Denotes a PR that should be squashed by tide when it merges.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants