Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add 4.8 and change master to 4.9 #19435

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 22, 2021

Conversation

ravanelli
Copy link
Member

  • Since 4.9 is not yet in place the tag for master still 4.8 for now

Signed-off-by: Renata Ravanelli rravanel@redhat.com

 - Since 4.9 is not yet in place the tag for master still 4.8 for now

Signed-off-by: Renata Ravanelli <rravanel@redhat.com>
@darkmuggle
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

Thanks for working on this @ravanelli!

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 21, 2021
@ravanelli
Copy link
Member Author

@jlebon Would you mind taking a look on that?
This is part of coreos/coreos-assembler#2226

Copy link
Member

@jlebon jlebon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One nit, but LGTM overall. Not super familiar with Prow-speak though so leaving it to @cgwalters to have a look and do the stamping.

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
base_images:
coreos_coreos-assembler_48:
coreos_coreos-assembler_49:
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems like this should just be called coreos_coreos-assembler_latest instead, no? There is no 4.9 cosa yet so this is misleading.

Or actually, since we have to keep using the 4.8 image for now until we fix openshift/os#552, maybe better to just not touch this file at all. (But then eventually once we do fix that, it'd be coreos_coreos-assembler_latest here and tag: "latest" below.)

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@jlebon meh, it got merged already. Let me know what do you think, if should I change it following the comments above.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That's OK, I'm sure we'll keep tweaking these settings in the future as we sort everything out.

Thanks a lot for looking at this!

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 22, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: darkmuggle, jlebon, ravanelli

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 22, 2021
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 1ef72a4 into openshift:master Jun 22, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 22, 2021

@ravanelli: Updated the following 3 configmaps:

  • job-config-4.8 configmap in namespace ci at cluster app.ci using the following files:
    • key openshift-os-release-4.8-presubmits.yaml using file ci-operator/jobs/openshift/os/openshift-os-release-4.8-presubmits.yaml
  • ci-operator-master-configs configmap in namespace ci at cluster app.ci using the following files:
    • key openshift-os-master.yaml using file ci-operator/config/openshift/os/openshift-os-master.yaml
  • ci-operator-4.8-configs configmap in namespace ci at cluster app.ci using the following files:
    • key openshift-os-release-4.8.yaml using file ci-operator/config/openshift/os/openshift-os-release-4.8.yaml

In response to this:

  • Since 4.9 is not yet in place the tag for master still 4.8 for now

Signed-off-by: Renata Ravanelli rravanel@redhat.com

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants