Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Where to Put the Potency/Clearance Data for this Series #1

Closed
mattodd opened this issue Mar 18, 2020 · 9 comments
Closed

Where to Put the Potency/Clearance Data for this Series #1

mattodd opened this issue Mar 18, 2020 · 9 comments
Assignees
Labels
question Further information is requested Techops How things work

Comments

@mattodd
Copy link
Collaborator

mattodd commented Mar 18, 2020

The inherited data for this series, and the data we're likely to acquire soon, will consist of whole cell potency vs MRSA and in vitro clearance rates. These are different from the typical data we'll be acquiring for the fragments in Series 1, in the mur ligase project.

Yet we really ought to try to reduce fragmentation and keep data in one place.

Shall we upload the inherited data to the current OSA spreadsheet, in a separate tab? Danger: if we use one numbering system for both series (we should), we may become confused as to where we're up to.

Ping @drc007 for opinion, as well as anyone else.

@mattodd mattodd self-assigned this Mar 18, 2020
@mattodd mattodd added question Further information is requested Techops How things work labels Mar 18, 2020
@drc007
Copy link

drc007 commented Mar 19, 2020

@mattodd
We need to have a single numbering system, or if a compound is tested in multiple assays you will end up with multiple identifiers. We need a single registration system, the the spreadsheet is not ideal but at present is the best we have. We should revisit the grant to support creation of a proper registration system now we have a prototype database we can use to demo.

@drc007
Copy link

drc007 commented Mar 19, 2020

@mattodd Main spreadsheet should be used for registration, to get a unique ID, and generate InChiKey etc. Biological results can go in a separate sheet, but using the unique ID molecule identifier as key.

Does this make sense?

@danaklug
Copy link
Contributor

danaklug commented Mar 19, 2020

@drc007 Yep, I think this is the best system. Does it make sense to add SB-044868 and the ALM-DAI focused array compounds to the spreadsheet now? I'm just thinking maybe it's best to consistently refer to them by OSA numbers from the beginning. Happy to add them now if you also think that's a good idea!

@drc007
Copy link

drc007 commented Mar 19, 2020

@danaklug If you are willing to do that it would be great.

@danaklug
Copy link
Contributor

@drc007 No problem!

@danaklug
Copy link
Contributor

Okay, this is done - I've just filled in SMILES, InCHIKey, name, and MW.

@fidiris @rhanson1046 FYI: All ALM compounds now have OSA IDs.

@drc007
Copy link

drc007 commented Mar 19, 2020

Excellent!!

@rhanson1046
Copy link

rhanson1046 commented Mar 19, 2020 via email

@fidiris
Copy link
Contributor

fidiris commented Mar 25, 2020

Just to summarise and close this issue.

New compounds will be assigned an OSA ID and added to the master sheet. Once we get biological data back, this will go in a separate tab using the OSA ID as the molecule identifier.

Link to the sheet can be found here

@fidiris fidiris closed this as completed Mar 25, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested Techops How things work
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants