Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Experimental features policy #59

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Experimental features policy #59

wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

hlandau
Copy link
Member

@hlandau hlandau commented Nov 21, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Moved from openssl/technical-policies#79

Changed to require approval of both OTC and OMC (last commit)

Fixes openssl/project#279

@hlandau hlandau added the policy change A change to a policy is being proposed label Nov 21, 2023
@hlandau hlandau requested a review from a team November 21, 2023 12:49
@hlandau hlandau self-assigned this Nov 21, 2023
@hlandau hlandau mentioned this pull request Nov 21, 2023
Closed
@hlandau
Copy link
Member Author

hlandau commented Nov 29, 2023

Needs feedback from @arapov

@hlandau hlandau mentioned this pull request Nov 29, 2023
Closed
@t-j-h t-j-h requested review from arapov and removed request for a team December 12, 2023 11:41
@arapov arapov assigned arapov and unassigned hlandau Jan 4, 2024
arapov
arapov approved these changes Feb 14, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@arapov arapov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It looks good; however, I'd like to ask to hold off on using it until we have a prominent candidate to include as an experimental feature.

policies/experimental-features.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
policies/experimental-features.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@hlandau
Copy link
Member Author

hlandau commented Feb 14, 2024

Updated. Do we want to adopt it and not use it yet, or wait for a candidate before voting on it?

@arapov
Copy link
Member

arapov commented Feb 14, 2024

For now, we need to wait and discuss it additionally at f2f, and it will require to obey the new policy adoption process.

@arapov arapov requested a review from nhorman March 16, 2024 13:56
@arapov arapov assigned nhorman and unassigned arapov Mar 16, 2024
@openssl openssl deleted a comment from nhorman Mar 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@arapov arapov arapov approved these changes

@nhorman nhorman Awaiting requested review from nhorman

Assignees

@nhorman nhorman

Labels
policy change A change to a policy is being proposed
Projects
Project Board
Status: In progress
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Review an experimental feature policy
3 participants
@hlandau @arapov @nhorman