Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

How do I add a way to an existing, but not adjacent, relation? #1906

Closed
SomeoneElseOSM opened this issue Oct 20, 2013 · 5 comments
Closed

How do I add a way to an existing, but not adjacent, relation? #1906

SomeoneElseOSM opened this issue Oct 20, 2013 · 5 comments

Comments

@SomeoneElseOSM
Copy link

See this help question:

https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/27100/id-how-do-add-a-way-to-an-existing-but-not-adjacent-relation

There were no replies there, so I presume that the answer is "you can't, yet".

I was looking for information about iD because a new mapper has added new bits of a walking route in iD by naming them "blah trail" instead of adding to the existing "blah trail" relation. Whilst it may be easier to add to relations currently in Potlatch (or JOSM) I was wondering whether I could suggest something that didn't involve learning a different editor.

@jfirebaugh
Copy link
Member

Correct -- the search is currently limited to relations with a member within the current viewport, which is pretty limiting for some scenarios.

@vadmium
Copy link

vadmium commented Oct 24, 2014

I think in the past I have worked around this by either zooming out, or dragging the viewport around so that part of the existing relation comes into view

@d3netxer
Copy link

Vadmium, if you zoom out too far then you might not be able to edit anymore. This was the case in one of my situations, where I could not get the two features in the same view.

@HolgerJeromin
Copy link
Contributor

We have a nice text input field in the relation section.
It would be nice and easy if i could paste the full osm-url or only the number of the target relation here.

@bhousel
Copy link
Member

bhousel commented Nov 1, 2016

moved to #3487

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants