-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 403
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: code edits reporter code #4153
Conversation
Walkthrough此拉取请求对 Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
packages/core-common/src/types/ai-native/reporter.ts (1)
97-100
: 架构改进建议通过将通用的报告字段移至
CommonLogInfo
接口,代码结构得到了优化。建议考虑以下改进:
- 为这些字段添加 JSDoc 文档,说明使用场景和注意事项
- 考虑添加类型守卫函数来确保字段使用的类型安全
示例改进:
+ /** + * 表示代码是否被采纳 + * @remarks + * 此字段用于统一追踪代码采纳状态,替代各个子接口中的特定字段 + */ isReceive?: boolean; + /** + * 表示代码是否被弃用 + * @remarks + * 此字段用于统一追踪代码弃用状态,替代各个子接口中的特定字段 + */ isDrop?: boolean;
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
packages/ai-native/src/browser/contrib/intelligent-completions/intelligent-completions.controller.ts
(2 hunks)packages/ai-native/src/browser/contrib/intelligent-completions/source/base.ts
(1 hunks)packages/core-common/src/types/ai-native/reporter.ts
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
packages/ai-native/src/browser/contrib/intelligent-completions/source/base.ts (1)
82-82
: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
报告字段变更的语义影响需要验证
将 isCancel: true
改为 isValid: false
改变了取消操作的报告语义。虽然这符合新的报告结构,但需要确保所有消费此报告数据的地方都已更新以适应新的语义。
建议添加以下改进:
- 在
CodeEditsRT
接口中明确定义这些字段的类型和含义 - 为报告状态添加类型常量或枚举,使状态值更加明确和类型安全
export interface CodeEditsRT {
isValid: boolean;
// 其他字段...
}
export const enum CodeEditsReportStatus {
Valid = 'valid',
Invalid = 'invalid',
// 其他状态...
}
✅ Verification successful
Let me generate additional scripts to verify the usage of isValid
field in the codebase:
代码变更验证完成,无需担心
通过代码分析,我们可以确认:
isValid
是一个标准的报告字段,在CodeEditsRT
接口中有明确定义- 将
isCancel: true
改为isValid: false
是合理的语义变更:isValid
用于表示操作的有效性- 在取消操作的场景下,将其设置为
false
符合语义
- 相关的消费代码已经适配了这个变更:
- 智能补全控制器使用
isValid
作为有效完成的标志 - AI 补全服务正确处理了
isValid
字段
- 智能补全控制器使用
这个改动是安全的重构,符合当前代码库的设计模式。
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# 描述:验证代码库中是否还有使用旧的 isCancel 字段的地方
# 测试:搜索可能使用 isCancel 的代码
rg "isCancel|\.cancel" --type ts
# 测试:搜索处理报告数据的相关代码
ast-grep --pattern 'interface $interface {
$$$
isValid?: $_
$$$
}'
Length of output: 39254
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# 搜索 isValid 字段的使用情况
rg "isValid" -A 3 -B 3 --type ts
# 搜索 reporterEnd 方法的定义和使用
ast-grep --pattern 'reporterEnd($_) {
$$$
}'
# 搜索相关的接口定义
ast-grep --pattern 'interface $_ {
$$$
reporterEnd?: $_
$$$
}'
Length of output: 26329
packages/ai-native/src/browser/contrib/intelligent-completions/intelligent-completions.controller.ts (3)
350-350
: 更新 reportData
方法的返回类型
reportData
方法的返回类型已更新为使用 isReceive
、isDrop
和 isValid
,这与新的报告字段一致。
371-373
: 在 discard
方法中更新报告调用
discard
方法中,根据条件调用 report?.('isDrop')
或 report?.('isValid')
。请确保逻辑符合预期,以准确报告丢弃和取消的情况。
381-381
: 更新 accept
方法的报告调用
accept
方法中调用 report?.('isReceive')
,符合新的报告字段,确保接受操作被正确记录。
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #4153 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 54.22% 54.23%
=======================================
Files 1598 1598
Lines 97652 97652
Branches 19976 19984 +8
=======================================
+ Hits 52954 52959 +5
+ Misses 37125 37120 -5
Partials 7573 7573
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
/next |
🎉 PR Next publish successful! 3.5.1-next-1730882731.0 |
Types
Background or solution
Changelog
修正 code edits 上报字段
Summary by CodeRabbit