Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

style: improve search panel popover content style #4342

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 6, 2025

Conversation

erha19
Copy link
Member

@erha19 erha19 commented Feb 5, 2025

Types

  • 💄 Style Changes

Background or solution

Before:
image

After:
image

Changelog

improve search panel popover content style

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • 样式更新
    • 调整了包含规则区域内列表项的不透明度,提升了视觉区分度。
    • 优化了排除规则区域的视觉表现,统一采用了适当的不透明度设置,使页面显示更柔和。

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 5, 2025

Walkthrough

此次更改仅涉及 packages/search/src/browser/search.module.less 文件中的样式调整。修改内容包括将 .include_rule_content 类中的 li 元素透明度设置为 0.7,以及将 .exclude_rule_content 类中 div 元素的 color 属性替换为透明度设置 0.7。这些改动仅影响页面的视觉表现,并没有引入新的功能或修改现有的逻辑。

Changes

文件 变更摘要
packages/.../search.module.less 调整 .include_rule_content li 的透明度 (opacity: 0.7);将 .exclude_rule_content divcolor 属性更改为透明度设置 (opacity: 0.7)

Suggested labels

💄 style change

Suggested reviewers

  • hacke2
  • bytemain
  • Ricbet

Tip

🌐 Web search-backed reviews and chat
  • We have enabled web search-based reviews and chat for all users. This feature allows CodeRabbit to access the latest documentation and information on the web.
  • You can disable this feature by setting web_search: false in the knowledge_base settings.
  • Please share any feedback in the Discord discussion.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a9626ca and 784ad05.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • packages/search/src/browser/search.module.less (2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (8)
  • GitHub Check: unittest (ubuntu-latest, 18.x, jsdom)
  • GitHub Check: unittest (ubuntu-latest, 18.x, node)
  • GitHub Check: build-windows
  • GitHub Check: unittest (macos-latest, 18.x, jsdom)
  • GitHub Check: build (ubuntu-latest, 20.x)
  • GitHub Check: unittest (macos-latest, 18.x, node)
  • GitHub Check: build (macos-latest, 20.x)
  • GitHub Check: ubuntu-latest, Node.js 20.x
🔇 Additional comments (2)
packages/search/src/browser/search.module.less (2)

302-305: 增强包含规则列表的视觉层次感

.include_rule_content 内的 ul > li 元素上设置透明度为 0.7 能够让包含规则列表的项显示得更柔和,从而与整体界面风格保持一致。建议在不同设备和浏览器上测试该样式,确保视觉效果符合预期。


325-328: 改进排除规则内容的视觉呈现

.exclude_rule_contentdiv 元素的颜色属性替换为透明度 0.7 可以弱化元素的视觉冲击力,使排除规则部分的展示更为柔和。请确保这种样式调整能在所有相关场景中提供足够的对比度和可读性。


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 5, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 54.23%. Comparing base (a9626ca) to head (784ad05).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##             main    #4342    +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage   54.23%   54.23%            
========================================
  Files        1638     1638            
  Lines      100155   100155            
  Branches    21738    21896   +158     
========================================
+ Hits        54319    54322     +3     
+ Misses      38088    38086     -2     
+ Partials     7748     7747     -1     
Flag Coverage Δ
jsdom 49.71% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
node 12.29% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Member

@hacke2 hacke2 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@hacke2 hacke2 merged commit 0581def into main Feb 6, 2025
13 checks passed
@hacke2 hacke2 deleted the style/improve-search-panel-style branch February 6, 2025 01:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants