Skip to content

feat(sdk): Expose policy binding hash from Nano. [backport to release/sdk/v0.10] #2869

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
strantalis merged 1 commit into from
Nov 4, 2025
Merged

feat(sdk): Expose policy binding hash from Nano. [backport to release/sdk/v0.10] #2869

strantalis merged 1 commit into from
Nov 4, 2025

Conversation

@opentdf-automation
Copy link
Contributor

@opentdf-automation opentdf-automation bot commented Nov 3, 2025

Description

Backport of #2857 to release/sdk/v0.10.

@opentdf-automation opentdf-automation bot requested review from a team as code owners November 3, 2025 18:48
@opentdf-automation opentdf-automation bot mentioned this pull request Nov 3, 2025
Merged
3 tasks
@opentdf-automation
feat(sdk): Expose policy binding hash from Nano. (#2857)
6ff7414 
### Proposed Changes

1.) Expose `PolicyBinding` method that returns a implementation of the
new `PolicyBind` interface.
2.) Create new `PolicyBind` interface with methods `String()` and
`Verify()`.

DSPX-1875

### Checklist

- [ ] I have added or updated unit tests
- [ ] I have added or updated integration tests (if appropriate)
- [ ] I have added or updated documentation

### Testing Instructions

(cherry picked from commit 5221cf4)
@opentdf-automation opentdf-automation bot force-pushed the backport-2857-to-release/sdk/v0.10 branch from ab3f267 to 6ff7414 Compare November 3, 2025 18:48
@github-actions github-actions bot added comp:sdk A software development kit, including library, for client applications and inter-service communicati size/s labels Nov 3, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 3, 2025

Benchmark results, click to expand

Benchmark authorization.GetDecisions Results:

Metric Value
Approved Decision Requests 1000
Denied Decision Requests 0
Total Time 185.454039ms

Benchmark authorization.v2.GetMultiResourceDecision Results:

Metric Value
Approved Decision Requests 1000
Denied Decision Requests 0
Total Time 105.673656ms

Standard Benchmark Metrics Skipped or Failed

Bulk Benchmark Results

Metric Value
Total Decrypts 100
Successful Decrypts 100
Failed Decrypts 0
Total Time 373.713224ms
Throughput 267.58 requests/second

TDF3 Benchmark Results:

Metric Value
Total Requests 5000
Successful Requests 5000
Failed Requests 0
Concurrent Requests 50
Total Time 39.57652284s
Average Latency 392.481639ms
Throughput 126.34 requests/second

NANOTDF Benchmark Results:

Metric Value
Total Requests 5000
Successful Requests 5000
Failed Requests 0
Concurrent Requests 50
Total Time 27.360784919s
Average Latency 272.584622ms
Throughput 182.74 requests/second

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 3, 2025

Benchmark results, click to expand

Benchmark authorization.GetDecisions Results:

Metric Value
Approved Decision Requests 1000
Denied Decision Requests 0
Total Time 180.368919ms

Benchmark authorization.v2.GetMultiResourceDecision Results:

Metric Value
Approved Decision Requests 1000
Denied Decision Requests 0
Total Time 104.36428ms

Standard Benchmark Metrics Skipped or Failed

Bulk Benchmark Results

Metric Value
Total Decrypts 100
Successful Decrypts 100
Failed Decrypts 0
Total Time 357.039743ms
Throughput 280.08 requests/second

TDF3 Benchmark Results:

Metric Value
Total Requests 5000
Successful Requests 5000
Failed Requests 0
Concurrent Requests 50
Total Time 38.928033817s
Average Latency 387.437931ms
Throughput 128.44 requests/second

NANOTDF Benchmark Results:

Metric Value
Total Requests 5000
Successful Requests 5000
Failed Requests 0
Concurrent Requests 50
Total Time 27.204302976s
Average Latency 271.088337ms
Throughput 183.79 requests/second

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 3, 2025

X-Test Failure Report

opentdfplatformCTX71B.dockerbuild
cukes-report
✅ js-v0.4.34
✅ java-v0.4.34
✅ go-v0.4.34
bats-test-results
❌ js-ab3f267d7b0f54e25508e5bad2b876de97fc465f
❌ java-ab3f267d7b0f54e25508e5bad2b876de97fc465f
❌ go-ab3f267d7b0f54e25508e5bad2b876de97fc465f

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 3, 2025

X-Test Failure Report

opentdfplatform34ZZGJ.dockerbuild
cukes-report
✅ java-v0.4.34
✅ js-v0.4.34
✅ go-v0.4.34
bats-test-results
❌ js-pull-2869
❌ java-pull-2869
❌ go-pull-2869

@strantalis strantalis merged commit 556a0e2 into release/sdk/v0.10 Nov 4, 2025
20 of 34 checks passed
@strantalis strantalis deleted the backport-2857-to-release/sdk/v0.10 branch November 4, 2025 19:05
@opentdf-automation opentdf-automation bot mentioned this pull request Nov 4, 2025
Merged
strantalis pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 4, 2025
@opentdf-automation
chore(release): release sdk 0.10.1 (#2876)
a926223 
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop*
---


##
[0.10.1](sdk/v0.10.0...sdk/v0.10.1)
(2025-11-04)


### Features

* **sdk:** Expose policy binding hash from Nano. [backport to
release/sdk/v0.10]
([#2869](#2869))
([556a0e2](556a0e2))


### Bug Fixes

* **deps:** bump toolchain to go1.24.9 for CVEs found by govulncheck
[backport to release/sdk/v0.10]
([#2872](#2872))
([fbda5d1](fbda5d1))

---
This PR was generated with [Release
Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See
[documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).

Co-authored-by: opentdf-automation[bot] <149537512+opentdf-automation[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@strantalis strantalis strantalis approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

comp:sdk A software development kit, including library, for client applications and inter-service communicati size/s

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@strantalis