Hotkey splitting #1559
Hotkey splitting #1559
Conversation
My understanding for the solution is the new netuid parameter give the coldkey ability to swap hotkey in any subnet. It will remove the limit of tx rate. also save the cost to register hotkey in every subnet. |
| pub const InitialEmaPriceHalvingPeriod: u64 = 201_600_u64; // 4 weeks | ||
| pub const DurationOfStartCall: u64 = 7 * 24 * 60 * 60 / 12; // 7 days | ||
| pub const InitialKeySwapOnSubnetCost: u64 = 10_000_000; | ||
| pub const HotkeySwapOnSubnetInterval: u64 = 7 * 24 * 60 * 60 / 12; // 7 days |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Why is 7 days divided by 12 here? The comment should be 7 days / 12 then
There was a problem hiding this comment.
one block each 12 seconds. like RootEnterDuration: BlockNumber = 5 * 60 * 24; // 24 hours
| /// Estimating the maximum stake for limited staking operations returned zero. | ||
| /// Zero max stake amount |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There is an issue with the comment here, no? Should be line 215 only
| /// Estimating the maximum stake for limited staking operations returned zero. | |
| /// Zero max stake amount | |
| /// Estimating the maximum stake for limited staking operations returned zero. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
should be a mistake, will remove it.
|
|
||
| // 17. Return the weight of the operation | ||
| // 22. Return the weight of the operation | ||
| Ok(Some(weight).into()) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is the goal to emit a refund of the weight here?
| #[pallet::weight((Weight::from_parts(240_600_000, 0) | ||
| .saturating_add(T::DbWeight::get().reads(31)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I don't know if there is a limit on the number of hotkey a user can have but I think this is related to the way you handle weight in the impl, you are trying to make it dynamic and return the weight at the end but what is returned is refunded, not billed to the user. What it does is take the weight defined here, take the returned weight and refund the difference. Is it what we want? What you could do is benchmark with a parameter on a big number of hotkey, like 100 (I don't know if this is realist), which will be the max amount billed to the user and then refund the difference based on the actual number of hotkey changed?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think we need to make the benchmark work for the extrinsic. we can discuss it internally.
The extrinsic just change one hotkey, I don't understand why we need bench test for 100 keys.
Do you mean we change the hotkey over 100 subnets
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Feel free to modify the benchmark.
l0r1s
left a comment
l0r1s
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The benchmark job has been skipped?
l0r1s
removed
the
skip-validate-benchmarks
hotkey splitting emergency merge of #1559
Description
Related Issue(s)
Type of Change
Breaking Change
If this PR introduces a breaking change, please provide a detailed description of the impact and the migration path for existing applications.
Checklist
cargo fmtandcargo clippyto ensure my code is formatted and linted correctlyScreenshots (if applicable)
Please include any relevant screenshots or GIFs that demonstrate the changes made.
Additional Notes
Please provide any additional information or context that may be helpful for reviewers.